Looks like it was tweaked to say “disputed” instead of “unlawful,” since I imagine the Trump admin will try to fight this.

lol. Those Wikipedia editors are fast.

Edit: now it’s a less spicy “disputed”

A con man named Kash, ripping you off in Vegas, while wearing plaid suit.

If I were to write a novel about this in 2010, the publishers would ask me to try harder.

That Christmas special is pretty tight if you live somewhere with legal weed.

Not that I know of

This one IS pretty surprising though.

This is kind of like finding out that Ron Jeremy had a trad wife.

I assume this isn’t a reverse engineering thing, and this is more of a “hey you’re using our service and AI, and we’d really like airdrop because our valley campus is littered with Macs” thing.

Yeah, the final text basically called out a ton of states and operated with the assumption that some GOP gerrymandering was going to happen since efforts were pretty firmly in motion. The button had been already pressed by other states.

https://vig.cdn.sos.ca.gov/2025/special/pdf/text-proposed-law.pdf

TX is going to appeal to the Supreme Court. TX still stands a very good chance of getting their maps.

Also, you can’t really fuck with districts at the last minute. You need time for candidates and elections officials to organize around them.

Also, the GOP is trying this shit in other states.

CA needs to just assume the worst out what the GOP put in motion. This is too hard to counteract late in the game, which is why all this stuff if started going down a year and a half in advance.

Yup. Unless the SCOTUS comes up with some stupid way to prevent California from doing something red states have been doing for years, but without voter approval.

But California and Newsom were pretty clear about this being 1000% about balancing political party power.

Most of human history also didn’t live to 80 and have to manage payments on a certified preowned Kia and a 3 / 2.5 in a good school district.

lol. And because Texas went ahead with gerrymandering before CA put prop 50 on the ballot, CA removed the “if Texas gerrymanders” clause from prop 50. Since it was happening, they yanked the unnecessary conditional logic.

So now, prop 50 is happening, but Texas is stuck in the mud, and the GOP might get the opposite of the corrupt thing they pushed for. Amazing.

Everyone is different, but a lot of studies show that late 20s / early 30s is a sweet spot for stability and not encountering big risks with conceiving.

That said, having kids in your early 20’s, and early 30’s both sounds miserable to me.

If you’re not already doing so, you probably should use a 3rd party client that can connect to Gmail and filter out spam.

If you tell us what platforms you use, we can probably provide some recommendations of stuff to explore.

There is a pretty good chance they ain’t leaving the nest after high school. Wage stagnation, increased housing prices, limited junior job roles. People stay at home forever these days.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/04/17/the-shares-of-young-adults-living-with-parents-vary-widely-across-the-us/

Google’s push for using Gemini is so aggressive. Everything is littered with pop ups.

Well, now it’s training LLMs on them.

It will become real if it gets shared and LLMs scrape it.

Kids at 25 is the least fun way to be 25.

AI turned Trump into blonde Xi Jinping.