Using this in a VM to work on some legacy software and it’s definitely a lot better than the standard at the moment

I wonder if people actually played Palworld here.

It’s an obvious mash-up of existing games, ripping straight from games like Breath of the World, Pokemon and Fortnite, even up to the music chimes.

I don’t think Nintendo should be suing, but people here defending how original the game is should really take a closer look at it.

Plugin systems don’t rely on lock files, they’re not part of the build at all.

I probably don’t know enough about the project, but how can it know what requirements plugins installed at a later time have?

The judge also blocked all bank accounts for Starlink, a different company.

While I think the ban is justified, the power the judge has is definitely fishy too.

Trees are trees, they still have a huge impact on the environment.

The more I hear about Monero, the bigger of a scam it seems

If I copy McDonald’s site one by one for my own restaurant and just change the name, you can expect to be sued.

And yet, their site is available publicly?

I still don’t see how that makes Firefox difficult.

The transition might be difficult, but I rarely see casual people use the options you describe.

It’s as easy as opening the shortcut and start browsing, I see no difference with Chrome there

Why would Firefox be difficult to use?

Pretty much everyone here agrees that it’s a shitty concept. Doesn’t solve anything and it’s a privacy nightmare.

No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.

Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.

Qwant uses their own index, but supplements it with Bing if they don’t have enough info (or for images).

It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.

All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.

Kagi is great, but I just can’t miss $5 a month for it.

I’m using Qwant now and it’s pretty good.

Not videogames, but the idea that a car should also be a video game console sounds very childish.

This is a newer function though, wasn’t always available

The implant is already malfunctioning after a few months. Makes you wonder how many more of these threads will retract over the next following months.

It was Interpol that made the request on behalf of the Spanish police according to the article.

If the product was as they marketed and sold it, it shouldn’t be able to run on Android.

Clearly they lied to their customers, I’d be pissed.