This person is almost selfdesctructive and just wants to argue, take a look at their comment history. They don’t realize they are actually pushing people away from being sympathetic to Palestinians by being this impetulent person who consistently argues in bad faith. You see them all over lemmy.

Actually yes they did vote trump, studies show that only 20% voted harris. Not to mention the article quite literally is quoting these folks’ justification for voting trump. The remainder was split between the green party (you know that party that doesn’t do ANY down ballot initiatives and only shows up in swing states in presidential elections) and trump.

This is ignoring the fact that not voting in a swing state is pretty much the same thing as voting for the other person because the race is so close.

It didn’t help trump directly but it did help him win.

Look I get it, the Dems didn’t do enough to win over their base and instead went to the center.

But these Dearborn folks in the article get what they deserve and should really shut the fuck up. They voted for a man who said he would extend his Muslim country travel ban to gaza and still thought somehow he was on their side.

You are a complete a total dumbass if you thought he was on your side. He has years and years of lying out of his ass and you believed him and it’s the Democrats fault? No I reject that. He literally stated in 2023 that he would extend his travel ban to Gaza. I feel like I need to take crazy pills or something, these people are insufferable.

The point of my comment was to call out the comment poster because it’s obvious they were using their own conjecture and just saying “I did a study.” Very common in this community because people just trust what other people say on face value. The fact they never followed up with anything at all means it was a bot or a dumbass just spouting off at the mouth about some bullshit. I appreciate you taking the time to find similar studies though, thank you.

I was not arguing anything except, “please show me where you read that” because I don’t know about this subject. But if you make a claim about a subject, you should be able to back it up or you’re lying.

I find it hard to buy that Mexican tortilla companies somehow buy only heirloom corn and American companies don’t. We know exactly why the tortillas suck in the US and it’s not cornmeal degradation ffs.

Highly recommend using cream installer or some other dlc grabber, I think it runs for like $500 if you buy all the dlc.

Hahahaha so the “thanks Mom,” was just banter then and not rude at all? Moron.

When you’re at the beach or some body of water and the dirt, mud, or sand gets on your hands, you get out of the water and start to dry off. I despise the feeling when your hands dry out.

Yeah if you had a time machine to the 70s maybe.

Removed by mod

I have nothing to say about those other things because I’m not an insufferable twat that is CONSTANTLY driving the conversation to that subject (your comment history dude, wtf?)

And so let me get this straight, because I don’t address the extra unrelated bullshit YOU brought up, you’re not willing to even entertain another side? Or better yet, you certainly didn’t re-research the subject.

Your moronic idea with executive orders proves you know so little about this subject and also concerns me I’ve been wasting my time speaking to a teenager.

You just love logical fallacies, they permiate your comments. Strawman, red herrings, no true Scotsman, and false dichotomies. C’mon dude, if you’re going to be insufferable, at least be a good debater.

It’s at 0 now! No clue what that says having been previously negative haha

My incistance on buying the cheap eggs finally pays off.

I too, like to post idiotic things on the Internet.

I don’t need to check out the differences in other foods because that isn’t relevant to this discussion. It may be relevant but then you would need to provide evidence of that connection, when it would be probably easier to cite the original source they spoke of, instead of having to provide two different sets of data.

I’m also curious how the degradation of cornmeal even happened, which I’m sure this study would touch on.

You… Really love grandatanding, huh?

I ask you to re-research the subject and you go into this putin-esqe historical diatribe about power in the United States. Seek help brother.

The president has never had much power, that’s kinda the whole point of our system of government you fucking rube. I’ll save you some trouble, the courts blocked him at every turn. Not a fan of the inaction of the Democrats but call a spade a spade, my guy - they tried.

I’m going to be honest here, I’m highly skeptical of the quality of cornmeal leading to lower quality tortillas. This is mainly because we already know why they are bad in the states. Not to mention the comment iteself is written like it was a conclusion made in conjecture.

Please cite the study you read/wrote that concludes cornmeal is the reason behind why corn tortillas are so bad in the us and that the deterioration of cornmeal is what led to it.

(Spoiler for anyone reading this, they didn’t have a source and were talking out of their ass about this subject. 0 evidence to back up their claim. Typical of lemmy.)

They aren’t wrong. Corn tortillas in USA are a crime to most hispanics. Go across the border and it’s night and day. Same thing with the bread here.

Unless you’re like a person who is astute at picking up very minute differences, you likely won’t taste a difference.

These are the words of a person who didn’t actually study what they are talking about. I invite you to re-reaearch this topic and find out why it failed instead of using it as an opportunity to grandstand about the Democrats.

New PC, new chain and sprocket for my moto, or pay down some debt would be nice, ain’t gonna happen tho lol.