Those evil, evil bastards did not think you were important enough to waste time writing a reply. Shame on them. Shame I say.
This was sarcasm, btw. Get over yourself.
sie/ihr, she/her
🖖🦄🦑⌛🦕🗾🎨🎮
Those evil, evil bastards did not think you were important enough to waste time writing a reply. Shame on them. Shame I say.
This was sarcasm, btw. Get over yourself.
Frank Sinatra singing Cruel Angel’s Thesis is now part of my playlist, I’m ashamed to say. I didn’t dare look further because I am weak. The appeal of the concept is undeniable, the implications are horrifying.
What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.
What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?
Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.
Nobody said “good”, but if it keeps existing, it works or at least isn’t harmful. Bit like evolution.
I fucking hate that this fucking exists. Fuck. /c/angryupvote
What do you mean multiple users? Everybody OBVIOUSLY needs their own device! And if your eyes get worse with age, you OBVIOUSLY need a brand new device! Swappable lenses, pfft, what is this, Marxism?
Huh. I didn’t realise until the end that this is from 2014, interesting.
Yep.