• 3 Posts
  • 1.31K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle






  • This is really the important point, specifically Miller. Even Vance is an empty vessel, he isn’t the motivator here. Miller is the one directing all of this.

    If these people are getting thrown to the wolves by Trump, it’s because Miller sees danger to himself and is Wormtonguing Trump to give the public & media fresh meat. But Miller’s goal here is just to make them stop pursuing before public hearings, investigations and the blame cycle reaches him. He’s hoping by replacing a few people (and maybe offering up Noem), the pliant GOP and fickle media will drop this.



  • I guess Trump made this specific accusation because he saw the headlines about him making at least $1.4 billion in his first year back in office, and felt he needed to poison the well.

    I know the DOJ has no credibility anymore, but god, imagine a world where they did their job and investigated the $400 million jet, the hundreds of millions of untraceable crypto and meme coins he’s started that foreign actors could use anonymously in violation of FECA and Constitutional emoluments restrictions, the “Board of Peace” donation fund controlled by Trump personally…







  • Photos of the scene, work timesheets showing who is there, witness information…

    I also would love to see charges filed immediately, but there’s a reason they collect all the evidence first. Yes, we all saw it, but a good state prosecutor has to know at this point the federal Trump DOJ and DHS will certainly remove the case to federal court (even if it proceeds under state law) and will try to intervene to dismiss. They will pull out every dirty trick possible to avoid a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That includes sabotaging evidence solely in their custody or claiming the prosecutor did not do due diligence and then produce some magically exonerating new evidence.

    If we want the charges to stick, we need to box in the DOJ and DHS.





  • I agree with the thesis of the video. The missing ingredient, leadership, is both missing and also prevented from forming bottom-up because the “leaders” in positions of opposition power - Jefferies, Schumer, etc - are just taking up space, issuing statements and doing nothing to organize meaningful opposition. These “leaders” need to step up or step down.

    But apart from that, I mean, I’m struggling to see the lesson for what it means for people on the ground. I debated with others many times here about guns/violence, and just to get it out of the way, I still do not think it benefits anyone to violently engage ICE. ICE has the federal government’s monopoly on violence and is aching to wield it. I’ve seen zero cases of protestor-initiated violence, but one case of clear violence started (even justifiably) from the protestors will be used for exponentially more indiscriminate brutality than whatever we gain, because they don’t view us as human and have no fear of prosecution. Their disinformation machine, helped by Russian bots and astroturf influencers, will amplify it a million-fold and could manufacture the consent they need.

    But at least, should protestors be armed? I thought that protesting while legally armed would dissuade ICE. But Alex Pretti was legally armed and was murdered, just like Renee Good was murdered while not armed.

    The only plausible non-violent tactic, beyond protesting and hoping, is an indefinite general strike. It doesn’t need to last long, and likely wouldn’t need to, but it just has to be organized well enough to be clearly sustainable indefinitely.

    Are any leaders anywhere planning that? I have heard zilch.