Brownies without the brown is ease, not knees.

It’d be more fun to restore someone else’s foreskin, magically.

That’s the problem.

A deadline is only as meaningful as your ability to convince people it is meaningful. Set a deadline as psygod, no one gives a shit. Set a deadline as a political action group with 2% of the population as members, now you’re getting some attention. 20%? Change is happening.

Free well-trained doggo as well.

AI first company? You mean investment scam?

The Armored Saint and Hellbound Hearts…

It’s going to be bloody.

Don’t frame it as practical. It’s moral.

It was, and in a number of places still is, ‘normal’ to say she’s a woman and therefor has no business having a private email address at all, that all communication with her should be through her father or husband, and that if she were to talk to a man herself she’d have to be beaten to make her behave more ‘normally.’ Normal just means common, not good. If she wants to keep talking to people through Daddy Google, that’s her choice, very ‘normal,’ but you would rather be good.

You should not be working 60 hours. No one should be. Being over-employed is just as harmful to your life as being unemployed, sometimes more so. You need time to do the things you originally went to work to be able to afford doing, otherwise what’s the point?

Is this entire post a disingenuous question or do you really not get it?

Or both.

I get tired pretty quick of games where the multiplayer aspect is considered important to enjoying the game. If your friends are with you, you can enjoy literally sitting in the dirt doing basically nothing, just chatting. If your game requires me to also drag friends into it like some cultist, just to make it pass the bar into ‘fun’ then the game is a failure, plain and simple. They don’t get credit for the fun I brought with me to the show I paid for.

No idea. Rome was never my bag. As far as OP, though, I can only guess they didn’t have quite your interest in the subject either.

Better for the fool maybe. Idiots being more visible helps everyone else avoid them.

NFPA 101 -

7.1.10.1 “Means of egress shall be continuously maintained free of all obstructions”

7.2.1.5.2 “Locks and latches shall not require the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort for operation from the egress side.”

To borrow a classic, ‘those who care, don’t matter, and those who matter, don’t care.’ People with something meaningful going on in their life are too busy to get caught up in celebrity gossip.

Option 1, admit you were wrong. Option 2, claim to be a part of a group hated by anti-racists Option 3, claim to be a part of one of the most hated groups in the world Option 4, 2 and also 3

Somehow they still preferred 2 over 1

Nero was in a position of power and hypothetically could have done something, hence the criticism of him for ‘fiddling while Rome burned.’ Are you suggesting the twenty-something year olds of this world have some power to turn things around?

You walked out and laid down in their home. What else do you expect?

The GUIs are nice, sometimes, especially for visual things. (Selecting an image, color, etc.) The terminal remains extremely powerful though in that it’s much closer to the object, as it were. If you want to, say, change a setting on your personal machine, as long as the GUI designer thought that option should be included in the GUI (because including every possible setting gets very large and unwieldy very quickly) you’re fine. But if you want to adjust that setting on 5, 10, 100 machines, that 30 second trip to the settings app turns into lots of work. If you want to set a setting that the GUI designer didn’t decide to include, you’re stuck. If you want to have an explanation of what you are doing, or what that other setting might do, terminal has man pages. GUI might have tooltips or a crowdsourced explanation.