The magical IT field is emitted in a cardioid aligned to the forward axis of the generator. Its effect is inversely exponentially proportional to the distance from the generator. This is why almost all IT problems are immediately solved only when you have put down whatever you were working on and actually started going over to help.

No, it’s pretty much the opposite. As it stands, one of the biggest problems with ‘AI’ is when people perceive it as an entity saying something that has meaning. The phrasing of LLMs output as ‘I think…’ or ‘I am…’ makes it easier for people to assign meaning to the semi-random outputs because it suggests there is an individual whose thoughts are being verbalized. It’s part of the trick the AI bros are pulling to have that framing. Making the outputs harder to give the pretense of being sentient, I suspect, would make it less likely to be harmful to people who engage with it in a naive manner.

Hmm. Well, first off, if you mean you don’t know how to write a script and don’t view it as worth learning for this task, that limits the task a fair amount. If you mean you don’t want to learn about the particulars of script based PDF editing or OCR, that’s understandable.

If you don’t want to script at all, you should be able to segment the PDFs via acrobat, or even just ‘print to PDF’ with page ranges on most viewers. There are ways of bulk renaming files once you have segmented them, even without scripting, though it’d be use case dependent as to whether/how that’d be useful to you.

If you want to script just a little, I made a script ages ago where I used the documents’ name to hold the metadata of what needed to be modified. You could certainly do that. (e.g. open the doc in one window, select the file for renaming in your file explorer, scroll through and input the sequence of pages in the rename field, [documentName3,7,15,22,29.PDF] run a script to segment the PDF at those page numbers so you end up with ‘documentName-1.PDF’ containing pages 1 to 2, another with 3 to 6, etc.)

A bit more effort could maybe be used to do some level of renaming, though how much use that would be would depend on the particulars of your case. I could see extending the previous script a little and making the page annotations include a doc type. (e.g. 13cn meaning segment at page 13 and label it as ‘originalDocumentName-clientNotification’, or even 13’arbitraryText’ and use the arbitrary text as the new file name)

The particularity of your case may be precisely why it hasn’t been automated yet.

I know there are scripting ways to work with PDFs. I was listening to someone talking just earlier about using a script and a localhosted LLM to organise and rename PDFs with author and title. If you can identify some kind of patterns (such as a heading that starts each document of a type) that you can detect, a script could find those pages and then feed that into something that will segment page ranges for each doc. It’s definitely possible but the patterns to look for will be determined by the docs you are looking at.

Possibly.

Hmm.

Short answer: potatoes.

Famously, you can survive on a diet of only potatoes. Starch gives you the caloric energy. Skins give you nutrients. Potatoes can be bought in large amounts for not much money in many places.

Everyday people coming to the aide of a fellow human who is fighting to stop herself being victimized is anarchy? Yeah, pretty much. Doesn’t seem like a bad thing, though. If we all took that level of responsibility, you wouldn’t need much of a governmental force.

There’s a lot of ink spilled on ‘AI safety’ but I think the most basic regulation that could be implemented is that no model is allowed to output the word “I” and if it does, the model designer owes their local government the equivalent of the median annual income for each violation. There is no ‘I’ for an LLM.

People are very aware of those. Many have them, and many of those who have them are all too willing to share them.

Brownies without the brown is ease, not knees.

It’d be more fun to restore someone else’s foreskin, magically.

That’s the problem.

A deadline is only as meaningful as your ability to convince people it is meaningful. Set a deadline as psygod, no one gives a shit. Set a deadline as a political action group with 2% of the population as members, now you’re getting some attention. 20%? Change is happening.

Free well-trained doggo as well.

AI first company? You mean investment scam?

The Armored Saint and Hellbound Hearts…

It’s going to be bloody.

Don’t frame it as practical. It’s moral.

It was, and in a number of places still is, ‘normal’ to say she’s a woman and therefor has no business having a private email address at all, that all communication with her should be through her father or husband, and that if she were to talk to a man herself she’d have to be beaten to make her behave more ‘normally.’ Normal just means common, not good. If she wants to keep talking to people through Daddy Google, that’s her choice, very ‘normal,’ but you would rather be good.

You should not be working 60 hours. No one should be. Being over-employed is just as harmful to your life as being unemployed, sometimes more so. You need time to do the things you originally went to work to be able to afford doing, otherwise what’s the point?

Is this entire post a disingenuous question or do you really not get it?