![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/79de5ca9-24a2-4f3d-b931-e68dc05ae1c5.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/1f910de9-62b5-43a9-8c93-94821c945577.png)
That’ll be great for most communities. That’s the exact opposite of what I want for a few specific ones though
That’ll be great for most communities. That’s the exact opposite of what I want for a few specific ones though
I am already subscribed!
Even lemmy.ml has suffered the occasional server hiccup. Most of the big instances are pretty stable now though
Why does anyone subscribe to [email protected]? It’s run by tankies. Therefore very biased.
All browsing is what really sucks for some niche communities. Until we have the ability to exclude our communities from all, these niche communities don’t have a chance to survive.
I use Plexamp. This requires a Plex server though.
That’d be awesome. I would greatly appreciate that
I don’t need a private community, although that option would be good.
What I really want is the ability to hide a community’s posts from the All and Local pages. (only visible if you go direct or you’re subscribed)
And if you search for the community you’re able to find it.
I think a better request is to get your client to show you just the communities from a particular instance in your feed, rather than actually switching instances to browse.
Sometimes I remember to check out Mastodon.
The queue all being the same is also really bothersome.
I want my communities to show the report until I (or someone from my mod team) deals with it. But when an instance admin marks it resolved, it disappears from my queue.
Selenium automation is a very personal and private thing. :-)
Oh. OK. That makes sense to do it with the SQL. Probably faster that way
You would need to build it into every call for showing local and all posts. Maybe there’s already a feature request for it.
I haven’t explored Lemmy code really at all. But it likely wouldn’t be all that difficult to implement.
Oh. You linked to the client. I think I’d build this into the API itself.
Even then, you could possibly block it from local, but not for all.
The community. Right now, sometimes people post stuff and it gets down voted into oblivion before anyone who actually subscribes can see it. And then even when you go directly to the community, people don’t see that post because it’s down voted so much.
And I mean… The posts in question were so not offensive… Just probably not what the general public wants to read or engage with.
Let me give you a concrete example:
How was your church service today?
That’s it. That was one of the posts that was down voted into oblivion.
It’s content delivery network in this context. Except that in this case, it handles all the internet traffic AND dns, I think
I don’t think so. I don’t see how it could. But I’m not that familiar with the apple side of things.
100% agree here.
The design of this is much better than VPN. Apple doesn’t know what you’re asking for or the data, but does know your ip. The CDN doesn’t know your ip but does know what you’re asking for.
And neither Apple nor the CDN have any way of matching the ip to the data at all since it’s abstracted several times and encrypted.
Note: I’m not an iOS user but this feature does tempt me to switch.
I was thinking the same thing.
I’m an Android user. Can I get an Apple Savings account too?