emmy5482

Historically, bodies of water are the most dangerous. Not just due to drowning but the constant threat of predators at the waters edge.

But the biggest problem with your statistic is that most kids just simply don’t have access to large bodies of water regularly. If you were to factor that in, I think you’d find the risk is much, much higher.

I think a lot of the downvotes I’ve gotten are from people who haven’t been exposed to much water. I grew up in Australia, we’re almost all trained swimmers.

But even here swimming lessons aren’t common before 5.

Kid was 5, went on a short walk to an open body of water where he would get feathers unsupervised.

When drowning is the second largest cause of deaths in children, I don’t think this is an acceptable level of risk.

Trial will determine whether that’s true or not though.

Interested to see where people move to. I didn’t know about it before but I’d like tobe involved now.

Well, their tone and lack of support for the latest pixel kinda does make me think that’s not true.

But I love a good conspiracy theory.

Like birds.

They’re not real

I think you misunderstand what is being said.

The point is that the post makes it sound like using a Pixel 11 under Android results in less security than before, but for most people there is no change since they never used MTE anyway.

That’s not what they’re saying. They’re saying Graphene without MTE is less secure, which isn’t something they want.

Which you can read from their post here

We strongly recommend against buying Pixel 11 devices. Pixel 8, 9 and 10 have much better overall security for GrapheneOS. Pixel 10 is cheaper with similar hardware and MTE. Pixel 11’s Titan M3 should improve BFU security for users without a strong passphrase, but losing MTE craters AFU security.

I mean, there was that one epstein file. Maybe they should prosecute that guy

I think it’s pretty clear you’re not a medical professional. At the least this isn’t anywhere near your specialty.

As for your increase in Vyvanse from 30-40mg. That’s the minimum, to one step over the minimum. The maximum is typically 70.

As for harm in sharing your experience, yeh. Self-medicating, refusing to take other meds etc is harmful.

I think a person google doctoring themselves is dangerous at best. That’s why.

And I’ve seen criminally large amounts of misinformation in posts like this. And including this. It would also take far too long for me to catalogue all the misunderstandings in it.

But I already detailed in another comment about how seretonin increases do not directly decrease norepinephrine. And do not do so in all people as you have claimed.

I don’t have to.

No claims in the initial post have been substantiated or sourced. Besides “trust me bro”.

But ok. Let’s start with a few.

First of all there are balances between neurotransmitters that are important. The seretonine, dopamine norepinephrine balance is one of these.

Its also important to note that this balance is different for everyone and each brain reacta slightly differently to medication.

The original post claims that Prozac lowers dopamine.

This is not true. In some patients it elevates seretonin levels and these elevated levels may cause the brain to release less dopamine.

This is not a guarantee and there is no direct mechanism through which prozac affects dopamine.

Thus it is incorrect to say that Prozac lowers dopamine without qualifiers on the how and the when. This is one reason why Prozac does work for some and doesn’t for others. (It also carries the side effect of increasing depression in some cases).

Now let me point out some other things. This person was diagnosed with depression prior to adhd. Which likely means their depressive symptoms were already present. Though this is not the point of their post, one of the symptoms of depression is distractability and low motivation to do things. Likely why they were originally prescribed prozac.

Now, to loop back, Prozac does not work for everyone.

Secondly, what they’re describing on Vyvanse sounds like the colloquial “Vyvanse crash”. Or what happens when your system doesn’t have enough of the Vyvanse to last the day. Typically the way to manage that is to up the dose.

So yeah. I think they got some shit in their post wrong and it should be removed for that.

I see why this was removed and I’m glad it was. This should also be removed here I think. Not because it’s ai or anything. Because the information is most likely incorrect.

Well, wet dirt is permeable and my understanding was they needed to stop the radioactive material leeching into the water table. Which would have caused radiation poisoning and cancer rates to soar for much of Europe.

It also was not stupid from start to finish. If it were, it would still be uncovered and half of Europe would need to be evacuated.

IMO the biggest problems were to do with the reactor design being secret. That and the attempted coverup afterwards. But I wouldn’t consider the cleanup to have been incompetent. The Chernobyl liquidators have been widely credited with limiting the effects of the disaster.

That’s definitely not accurate. For example, stopping the water table from being as polluted under the conditions meant having to use people.

They could also have just not bothered.

I’m not saying that their response didn’t kill a lot of people.

It did.

I’m saying it could have been much worse sr

5000 would have been a massive undercount too

I’ve been aware of this study for almost a decade now and am still constantly surprised it doesn’t get the attention it deserves.

Its pretty clear cut in its results

Looks like he is. Wow

This is the kind of dumb shit that only capitalism can promote

Mostly they just hire people that already agree with them. So this is fairly new to speak about openly. Normally the reporters just resign and cite “editorial differences”

I found the bot guys!

Found here

SPR oil is sold competitively when the President finds, pursuant to the conditions set forth in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), that a sale is required. Historically, the President has authorized emergency releases from the SPR on four occasions.

In short, yes I believe this to be the case