![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/629bd41c-8a34-4b74-acb6-379ae0c7c85e.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
They haven’t done a great job of marketing it. $100-120 a month isn’t bad and it beats the pants off of all the other satellite internet services.
They haven’t done a great job of marketing it. $100-120 a month isn’t bad and it beats the pants off of all the other satellite internet services.
Every server on the internet for every site you visit does this.
Why do this? Why not put the money into R&D and market research and come up with an AR device that would be mass market consumer friendly and accessible? Meta’s Quest 2 is doing very well and a device in the same price range with upgraded features would do well.
My guess is that it is expensive to run.
My local ISP lists one fee: the cost of service. I pay it. When I had Comcast at another residence I had all sorts of charges beyond the price of service. I don’t get why they can’t just be honest about the price to begin with.
This sounds so dystopian and completely unnecessary. What’s the point of a facial age estimate if you are asking them to put their age or DOB in to begin with? It’s pointless.
Never used the 720p plan because I have 4k TVs but I’m surprised at the number of people signing up for the ad supported plan. For me, the whole point of paying for streaming was so that I could support the film makers without dealing with ads.
There are a lot of fun indie titles out there. Give it a chance.