Fun fact: that’s actually the original reason we use rings to propose!

Finally, we really need to stop giving a shit what random anti-science conspiracy nuts think.

This but unironically. Were sex-wirjer positive here.

Eh, AI is a useful term to describe the subset of computer science that encompasses these more advanced processes such as machine learning, computer vision, LLMs, generative etc.

Arguing wether it’s “true intelligence” or not is just unproductive and pointless, like getting mad that almond milk isn’t really milk.

People forgetting what the CC in CCTV stands for and why it’s important.

We’ve been using the term AI for a very long time now and it’s a very generic term that covers a bunch of technologies, like we’ve been talking about enemies in video games having AI for decades and people don’t find the need to correct that

Compassionate fucking Buddha do people—sorry, not people: tech nerds—ever not comprehend the notion of “context” and “common parlance” and such.

I mean being autistic makes that a bit harder for me, but don’t let a little ableism get in the way of your weird little circlejerk.

Yeah true, but I’m really proud of the work my team does and very invested in it, so will always come to it’s defence when people say AI in general is bad, even if they probably mean genAI

Due to the nature of it we aim to minimise false negatives rather than false positives, but our current version gives a correct negative around 98.6% of the time a correct positive around 87.8%

Do you want to save people’s lives by diagnosing respiratory diseases months before even the most competent doctors could buy analysing x-rays and CT scans?

Then yes you need AI

AI has it’s legitimate uses and just blindly treating like the devil incarnate only hurts the many many valid criticisms of AI.

If it’s been off the air for a while that’s fine, but the worst thing is when you get into a show right as it’s random is dying.

Kind of. But I mostly only get to do hobbies on weekends and don’t always get my full 8 hours

Yeah that’s how it works in the UK. I work 9.30-6 with a 1 hour dinner break.

I don’t actually, hence why I stipulated more than a few thousand speakers

I think people are over estimating how long 100 years is.

No languages that are currently spoken by more than a couple thousand people are going to go extinct that quickly.

Remember 100 years is in the upper end of a human life span.

Wow look at Mr sex haver over here

I love this art style

I wonder, do people like you apply this morality to other unhealthy behaviours? Like do you defend people against shaming a porn addiction? Or smokers? Or any other self-destructive behaviour?

I have explained plenty well. You are just refusing to listen because you have already set your opinion in stone and have either ignored or twisted everything I have said to fit that opinion.

If you have any desire to engage in good faith I suggest you go back and re read my comments.

That means they have only been their a few centuries, so their is still massive potential harm to the environment that has been their much longer.