Okay, since I’m more than used to people arguing with me in bad faith in the internet.

Tell me, what evidence would I need to show you in order to change your mind?

???

China’s organ harvesting programs is pretty well known?

Yeah china is much more efficient and cuts out the middle man by just killing the homeless and taking their organs.

?

One joke

???

I’m really struggling to figure out what this means, are they trying to claim historical “witches” that were murdered were actually just intellectuals and scientists, are they saying modern witches, doing smudging and spells or whatever are the doing so because they’re intelligent and understand science? Or are they saying anyone woman that’s udecuated and knows science is actually a witch??

Stop falling for rage bait and then taking screenshots of this propaganda and posting it everywhere. You’re doing exactly what they want you to do because you want fake internet points.

I succeed NNN because to me it’s nonstop but november

Let me guess. They’re using the bribes donations are a form of free speech argument?

I mean have you seen what we’re working with? I swear it’s actually impossible to take a dick pic that actually looks good

Fun fact: that’s actually the original reason we use rings to propose!

Finally, we really need to stop giving a shit what random anti-science conspiracy nuts think.

This but unironically. Were sex-wirjer positive here.

Eh, AI is a useful term to describe the subset of computer science that encompasses these more advanced processes such as machine learning, computer vision, LLMs, generative etc.

Arguing wether it’s “true intelligence” or not is just unproductive and pointless, like getting mad that almond milk isn’t really milk.

People forgetting what the CC in CCTV stands for and why it’s important.

We’ve been using the term AI for a very long time now and it’s a very generic term that covers a bunch of technologies, like we’ve been talking about enemies in video games having AI for decades and people don’t find the need to correct that

Compassionate fucking Buddha do people—sorry, not people: tech nerds—ever not comprehend the notion of “context” and “common parlance” and such.

I mean being autistic makes that a bit harder for me, but don’t let a little ableism get in the way of your weird little circlejerk.

Yeah true, but I’m really proud of the work my team does and very invested in it, so will always come to it’s defence when people say AI in general is bad, even if they probably mean genAI

Due to the nature of it we aim to minimise false negatives rather than false positives, but our current version gives a correct negative around 98.6% of the time a correct positive around 87.8%

Do you want to save people’s lives by diagnosing respiratory diseases months before even the most competent doctors could buy analysing x-rays and CT scans?

Then yes you need AI

AI has it’s legitimate uses and just blindly treating like the devil incarnate only hurts the many many valid criticisms of AI.