They won’t find someone so earnest. So, they might have less success. The sycophant won’t be as high profile and therefornpesa powerful.
They won’t find someone so earnest. So, they might have less success. The sycophant won’t be as high profile and therefornpesa powerful.


There is a third option. Trump is a fool with a brain of mush and Mamdani was just personable and vaguely flattering while sticking to his agenda. Trump believes whomever speaks to him.


Yes, but rather than self praise, it seems to me like it’s being effusive and polite. As in, I’m not trying to be disruptive, please accept this kind gesture.

Maybe Ronaldo is wearing lifts?


Or the Chinese.
However, the point is that if they go bust, the technology is not lost. Someone will buy it and will seek to profit from it in the same way that NVIDIA currently does, by selling buck loads and pushing forward with development.


Why does anyone need NVIDIA? If they go busy, they sell their assets to pay their debts. Including IP.
I don’t think NVIDIA will go bust. They have a product people want even without ai and have been profitable for years.
However, they will have a giant correction.


Or its malicious compliance.


If this doesn’t get released, it becomes a bigger deal. Trying to pocket veto this would backfire.

I don’t think it’s the fact that she stuck by Bill. I think it’s the way she did it. She stuck by him and pretended that the women who had previously accused him we’re non existent and it was all Lewinskys fault. I think there was something about her not being Tammy Lynnette just standing by here man, but they were a team. However they were never together and all reports were that she despised him behind the scenes. It was seen as trying to pretend to be someone she is not, purely for power.


Yes, which is what that poster is saying.
AI technology is not a bubble. Investment in AI technology is a bubble.

You could even argue that it ruined Hilary Clinton’s presidency before it even started. Many turned against her when she decided to stick by Bill, in what was seen as a political act of convenience, that she tried to frame as duty and forgiveness.


The money around AI is a bubble. AI will stay, but not in the same format. That’s why the poster above said “AI itself”, to differentiate between the technology and the financials of the technology.


Od say it’s more that he doesn’t want to be left holding the bag. Dump now and you sell near the top of the market.


Phew. Glad it popped and everyone got it out of their system.
Yes. In the scheme of things, the subsidies seem miniscule compared to eunand USA subsidies over time.
Worst case, they put their western rivals in an unprofitable position thanks to state subsidy. Best casez they turn a profit thanks to the subsidy.
What I would like the euntonso is require.all.parts and tech in the ev market to be open source. Make it a commodity. Then if china subsidised, it’s to the benefit of the consumer. People worry about china dominance in the market. That only works for a closed market.
Require universal charging standards, universal software standards, universal battery storage standards etc and it’s a commodity.
Yes but we shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
A fork is great, but the more a fork deviates, the more issues there are likely to be. Firefox is already at low enough numbers that it’s not really sustainable.
I wish it was a clear pption in my browser.


The passkey is only passed on with an unlocked device. So, if someone stole your passkey device, they can’t copy it and use it without unlocking.
That was my first thought, but hearing her statements, I think she’s out. If she was pivoting to something else, I think she would have announced that instead.