It’s one vote away. Every bigger city can have one school for early birds and one for night owls. Then parents can start work whenever they want. For that, companies can have flexible starting times. If they work in shifts, allow people to trade shifts so that some do all the early and some do all the late shifts.
Without artificial light, there were no sleep problems because more than enough hours were darkness. People took breaks from sleep.
The answer is maturity. Structure does not hurt if it is chosen voluntarily. It feels good to do things exactly as intended.
Waking up at 6:30 doesn’t hurt if sleep started early and without being drunk.
The big tragedy is that society does everything to keep as many people as possible in a state of disarray. People to whom life is as described above don’t have the will to leave bad employment situations behind.
China, India, The Americas, Australia, many parts of Africa? Life was good there.
Even Europe was not that bad. If you had many more free days, work that was meaningful and unprocessed food, how bad would it be to die earlier? In total, they still had more days of life for themselves.
That paragraph was not meant to be in support of human trafficing.
Let me add that there is a huge incentive to keep Mexico and the rest of the Americas in a state of disarray. Individual success stories don’t outweight the overall cruelty of the current arrangement.
How do you recognize a slave? There is no need for chains to make people work against their will.
Whoever dreads monday morning doesn’t have to be worried about slavery anymore.
Have you tried moving? The chains are already there.
We accept all identities but not the animalistic core of identity, the smell.
People can dress however they want but they cannot smell however they want.
It makes sense because we can look away or close our eyes. It still says something about the limits of acceptence.
So you need ChatGPT to get a helpful answer.
MS 1 : Google 0
No disagreement from me. Most likely it will get worse.
Farmers will pay more to hire local workers and they can sell their products for more because everybody has to pay more. This will effectively rise minimum wage for every citizen because demand for legal workers will increase.
Are only the farmer short sighted or do the emotions in this post come from people who know what is coming? Soon there will be a time when prices for food will rise but wages have not adjusted. It’s not the farmers who will work more but every above minimum wage worker whose wages don’t adjust.
Regular citizens have profited of human trafficing and low wages for unskilled workers.
The farmer will not work more. He will pay more for workers and sell food for more.
It will rise prices for everybody. Which is good, because cheap prices came from essentially slavery.
They had to. If life in western Europe would have been worse than in eastern Europe, people would have elected communists.
If you don’t come to America, America comes to you.
Those were concessions to look good compared to communist countries. There is no need for a good impression anymore.
It’s Gulag for everybody who doesn’t win. You can’t blame lefties for not cooperating. It’s still unfortunate.
Yes, that’s not the point.
two things are similar so you don’t really have strong feelings either way.
Acceptance or rejection, no strong feelings either way.
Maybe that’s what they are saying? They impartially judged the application, without strong feelings. Ironically.
It’s like machines replacing farm hands. It’s the end of feudalism because the peasants are not needed anymore. The feudal lords won’t make the profits but the factory owners and the mining owners.
If the AI companies are the mines, what are the factories?
With AI, essentially everybody starts at middle management or above because the grunt work is automated. Now it’s all about allocating resources, acquiring clients and creating new products.
Somebody has to monitor the AIs and write the prompts. It’s middle management for everybody.