30% its [sic] in the title
Right, but I don’t see anything in the title or the article itself about 30% being “sufficient.” To the contrary, the article quotes Sarah Brown, energy think tank Ember’s European program director:
The EU is “very much on the way” to its goal of having renewable sources account for 72 per cent of power generation by 2030.
This article is a celebration of a milestone that was crossed for the first time, no mention of 30% being sufficient. You’re assigning meaning that’s not there.
Who the helll [sic] thought a minority of renewables sufficient?
Where are you getting this from?
That’s pretty neat.
I hadn’t thought of that, but after a quick investigation I don’t think it has to do with language settings for a couple reasons:
Any other ideas? Could this be a technical glitch of some kind?
Yup—this whole article is a big fat nothing burger, but it’ll generate clicks, which is all that matters in the digital age.
EDIT: Judging from some of the comments in this thread, rage bait headlines work. For better or worse.
Well, they’re “purchases” of a license that can be revoked at any time for any reason.
They were ordered to pay it, but have they actually paid it?
How? GPT4All + Llama or something else? I just started dipping my toe in locally run open source LLM.
You’ve hit the nail on the head with this one. I think the other commenters are right, that a lot of people will misuse the tool, but nonetheless it is an issue with the users, not the tool itself.