Doubling down on his trade wars, Trump is threatening to raise taxes on many goods from Canada, hike his universal tariff on imports from around the world and punish Brazil for prosecuting his friend, the country’s former president.

On Saturday, Trump announced more tariffs still, this time on two of the United States’ biggest trade partners: the European Union and Mexico, at 30% each.

Former U.S. trade negotiator Wendy Cutler said that Trump’s recent moves “underscore the growing unpredictability, incoherence and assertiveness’’ of his trade policies. “It’s hard for trading partners to know where they stand with Trump on any given day and what more may be coming their way when least expected,’’ said Cutler, now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

  • hansolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Policies? What policies? What negotiation? It’s haphazard short attention span theater that American taxpayers ultimately pay for.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s because he’s an imbecile pedophile with dementia. Let me break it down for you he wants a bribe or a child to rape.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Seems to me that it’s time for other nations to make the best of the prisoner’s dilemma and drop tariffs with each other while sanctioning the US. After all, the US at this point has broken almost all its treaties and trade agreements. There’s no reason for the rest of the world to honour what no longer exists.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    It’s impossible to negotiate with these guys, because they have no clear demands. They just want what “looks” like as much as they can get away with…

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There are trade negotiations actively running between US an EU, and Trump simply ignored it when he rolled the dice for new Harrods.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    17 hours ago

    These countries need to walk away from the table until someone stable can take over negotiations. Why would anyone sign a trade deal with someone, knowing they are never going to honor the conditions they just agreed to? By next week, Trump will have completely forgotten that he signed anything…so why bother?

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why would anyone sign a trade deal

      because of money, there’s no other explanation needed. No other country consumes as much as the US, and you need them to keep buying your exports.

      If that isn’t enough for you, the Europe relies Heavily on the US for its defense. Every country has a military base, only France (can’t remember who else) has nukes, so if you want to not be invaded, you kinda have to bend a knee.

      What is crazy is that it has been like this for decades, while Europe let itself be dominated by the special interests, and now it cannot unify against the hand that used to feed and protect it.

      And Russia has been arming like crazy, hoping to gobble anything it can.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        52 seconds ago

        Lol! Ok. Would you buy something you don’t even need, from a supplier that is going to change the price on you every other day, just to try and fuck you over?

        Nothing you said, makes up for the fact that Trump is an unreliable trade partner. In fact, all of the factors you mentioned make for very good reasons to find other supply connections. If those things are that important, then dealing with Trump is the stupidest way to try and guarantee steady business.

      • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The UK has nukes. Tho it’s not entirely sovereign as their ballistic submarines use American Trident II missiles. Which are on lease and maintained in the US. Still independent launch, just not long term.

        https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/heres-how-britains-nukes-are-operationally-independent/

        Also they want to purchase F-35A to drop nuclear bombs but that would be Americans B61 and not even on lease. just straight up only work if the US wants to. Also the F-35A can’t be refueled by existing UK tanker aircraft because American jet use boom refueling while everyone else use drogue refueling.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c335406gxdvo

        • kebab@endlesstalk.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          UK is probably the biggest supporter of the US in Europe (along with Poland) and is not a part of the EU, hence not affected by the tariffs mentioned by the OP

          • dickalan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I voted you down just now because I despise Internet strangers who complain about Internet points

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Could not give a fuck about points, but if I’m not correct, please explain why.

  • Maeve@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Stop negotiating and play hardball. Thank you, where’s my 6 digit salary?

  • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    As a Canadian I think we shouldn’t even be entertaining the thought of trade with the regime (yes I know how difficult that would be and realistically it’s not immediately possible. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be working toward it) Unfortunately we have a conservative banker in liberal colors as PM and that’s never going to happen.

    Edit: and the same type of brain rot citizenry raised on American exceptionalism who will argue that our PM has our best interests in mind. That they believe he’s smarter than the average bear and we couldn’t ever comprehend his tactics because we are just dumb pleebs.

  • catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I’m about to write something that I, with no international politics nor trade education but plenty of opinions shaped by social media, thinks world leaders should take note of.

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If the current trade agreements with Canada, Mexico and Japan are so terrible then whoever it was that signed them is probably unfit to try negotiating new ones. Oh wait, that was also Donald Trump.