• 106 Posts
  • 540 Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 17th, 2019

help-circle









  • There’s a few star trek episodes where they deal with characters who become addicted to either holodecks/holosuites, or games, but I guess it being a space-socialist-utopia of sorts, they give people enough 3rd spaces and community gatherings, so that its rare to find people who completely retreat from real life, and usually a sign of some mental affliction or trauma.

    At least right now, I don’t see the US recovering from this… 3rd spaces might pop up here and there, but they’ll be increasingly rare, and against the trend of overall social isolation.







  • Signal’s server is open-source

    Prove it, give me ssh access to their centralized server so I can verify that they’re running the code they’ve published. Otherwise this is a “just trust me” claim.

    Also, I don’t think Signal can get your name without a government to look it up.

    There are 10 websites that publicly publish phone number and identity info, right now. Not even a government, but a random stranger can convert your phone number to your real identity.





  • what information is provided to an entity about whom.

    “Content” and “Context”

    Why is only message text considered “information / content / context” here. Signal has your real name and address via phone numbers, and has every other real person you talked to, and when. Why is “message text” considered context, but social networking graphs aren’t?

    All these definitions are highly subjective, and the above one clearly considers social networking graphs to not be “content”. Basically they’ve re-defined privacy in a way that excludes highly sensitive information like everyone you talk to, and when.


  • thanks to end to end encryption. You can evaluate the protocol yourself with your own eyes, except clearly you cannot read, but modulo that.

    This means nothing when you have no idea what code the server is running, they even went a whole year without publishing their server code updates, until they got a lot of backlash over it. Real security doesn’t require a “just trust us” claim.

    Also, metadata is content. Even if they don’t have the message text, Signal still has the real identities of everyone you talked to, and when. With that you can build social network graphs, which are far easier to harvest and more useful anyway than trying to read through message content and determine meaning.


  • Signal is not open source, its a centralized US service, and you have no idea what their server is running. They even went a full year without publishing server code updates at one point, until it caused enough of a backlash that they started doing it again. But publishing that is no guarantee of anything, because you have no access to their server.

    mathematically impossible for Signal to gain access to your sensitive information (except for your phone number, obviously).

    A phone number in most countries, including the US, means your real name and address.