Perhaps because you didn’t understand what they said.
they repeat what i said, did you read them? previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that
From your own article
Is it impressive that DeepSeek-V3 cost half as much as Sonnet or 4o to train? I guess so. But OpenAI and Anthropic are not incentivized to save five million dollars on a training run, they’re incentivized to squeeze every bit of model quality they can. DeepSeek are obviously incentivized to save money because they don’t have anywhere near as much.
they repeat what i said, did you read them? previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that
Yes, and it says exactly what I claimed. DeepSeek is an improvement, but not to the level initially reported. Not even close.
Youtube uses a fuck ton of power but is an incredibly efficient video delivery service
What a colossally stupid thing to say. We’re not looking at starting up new nuclear reactors to run YouTube.
they repeat what i said, did you read them? previously ai model training was entirely based on simply buying more chips as fast and as hard as possible, deepseek changed that
From your own article
https://www.seangoedecke.com/is-deepseek-fast/
https://www.yahoo.com/news/research-exposes-deepseek-ai-training-165025904.html
^ fyi that article you linked to is an AI summary of a semianalysis.com article, maybe AI is useful after all ;)
Youtube uses a fuck ton of power but is an incredibly efficient video delivery service
The growth and popularity of AI and its uses is simply outpacing the efficiency gains
Yes, and it says exactly what I claimed. DeepSeek is an improvement, but not to the level initially reported. Not even close.
What a colossally stupid thing to say. We’re not looking at starting up new nuclear reactors to run YouTube.
🫠 I cannot be any clearer: