• ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial. I believe Rufus has an option when creating Win11 install USBs to remove the TPM and other requirements.

    But then again, it’s nice, because all I need to make sure Microsoft doesn’t secretly update my Win10 machine in the night to Win11 is to turn off the TPM in the BIOS.

    • Tux@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      But then you won’t receive any updates if you use unsupported hardware to run Win 11

    • john117@lemmy.jmsquared.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      You can bypass the requirements since yeah, they were always artificial.

      I think bypassing these checks would eventually render your PC vulnerable? for example, bitlocker support being void for computers that relies on TPM 2.0

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        14 days ago

        There is no home-user need to run bitlocker. There’s dozens of alternatives, that do not rely on TPM, that are just as effective, and that you really should be using anyways since they aren’t controlled by M$.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      You can bypass the requirements

      Not all of them. Windows 11 stopped booting with Update 24H2 on CPUs that don’t support the Instruction POPCNT. But that’s only an issue for really old CPUs like Intel Core 2 Duo and AMD Athlon 64 X2

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          Another angle: Those were some of the first dual-core x86 processors, released 2006 and 2005 respectively. (Intel had the Pentium D as its first in 2005).

          I don’t remember which I had for sure. I’m leaning more towards Core 2 Duo. It was my first PC, I was 12 and built it with my father.

          • xthexder@l.sw0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            I also got my first computer around then. I saved up for ages and bought the first gen Intel MacBook with an Intel Core Duo (2 cores, no hyperthreading). I still have that laptop somewhere… It blew my mind it could run Windows, and Windows laptops couldn’t compare at the time.

    • Fisch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Rufus has that option, I’ve used it myself to update to Win11 because I didn’t have a motherboard with TPM at the time.
      Also wanna mention, the reason I updated was mostly because I thought Win10 was kinda ugly and I think Win11 was a huge update in that regard and also because of security reasons, since Win10 won’t receive any more updates in the near future. At the end of the day, I can count on one hand how often I boot Windows in a year (I almost exclusively use Linux), so I don’t really care about all the Win11 bullshit anyway.