Lawmakers in Florida are raising alarm over documents suggesting immigrant children and pregnant women could be detained at āAlligator Alcatraz.ā
A draft operational plan obtained by the Miami Herald suggests minors could indeed be transported to the controversial site in the Everglades. The 35-page undated document details protocols to āseparate minors from unrelated adultsā and to provide āsnacks and waterā to minors, pregnant women and detainees with medical conditions during transport.
āThe State of Florida is planning to send pregnant women and children to the āAlligator Alcatrazā detention camp,ā wrote State Senator Carlos Guillermo Smith on social media. āThis is totally un-American. We cannot be silent.ā
Why? All people should be spared inhuman behaviour.
Iām sorry but āi donāt like equalityā feels like nonsense to me. Men should have every potection afforded to others.we should protect all people to the best of our ability.
Youāre either misunderstanding me or Iām not being clear enough, but I didnāt say any of that lol. Iām gonna go step by step here and try to be really clear, but if Iām misunderstanding anything please let me know.
Yeah, I agree with you, and I donāt think Iāve suggested anything to the contrary. Iāve just said that certain vulnerable groups sometimes require more protection than men. Because theyāre more vulnerable than men.
It feels like nonsense to me too, probably because I didnāt say that either. But what it seems like youāre suggesting is to ignore the circumstantial differences between groups, even when one group is more vulnerable than another, in the name of treating everyone the same, i.e, āequalityā. But I take issue with that, because that sort of thinking leads to inequal outcomes. As in, if a vulnerable group is treated exactly the same as their less-vulnerable counterparts, the vulnerable group will experience more negative outcomes on average, thus experiencing inequality.
In general, yeah, absolutely, except in cases where a particular protection only applies to a group that excludes men. The same logic applies to every group. Maybe this is just semantics at this point, but I donāt see the point of affording a protection to a group that it doesnāt apply to. All that is sort of beside the point though, because at no point have I suggested that any one group have protections taken away, just that some vulnerable groups require more protection than others in order to experience equality.
One hundred percent agree. In my view, we do that by trying to figure out what everyone needs as a baseline, identifying the more vulnerable groups by figuring out who that baseline doesnāt satisfy, and then figuring out what extra things those vulnerable groups need. Thatās all Iām advocating for - protecting vulnerable groups by figuring out what extra protections they need, not taking protections away from less vulnerable groups.
I wouldnāt consider ānot being sent to a death campā to be an extra protection that only applies to specific groups of people, though
Neither would I, and I havenāt said anything of the sort.
Right, but we were talking about how people were less concerned when men get sent to the death camps, and then you made the point that some protections donāt apply to men. You can see the connection. I donāt believe thatās the point you were intending to make but nonetheless I felt it was necessary to voice my disagreement for the sake of a complete discussion.
Maybe this is going to come across as just pedantry, but I really feel like some people are missing some pretty important things here. The thread started with this question:
I thought it was wild to leap to āmen donāt matterā on a post about pregnant women and children being sent to a concentration camp. That pivot felt misguided at best, and misogynistic at worst. I replied with a reminder that pregnant women and children are a more vulnerable group than men, as an alternative, *non-malicious explanation for why the article calls those groups out specifically. I was just trying to push back on the misguided notion of āmedia reports on group A, therefore they donāt care about group B.ā
Ah okay, that makes more sense. Thanks.