They think protecting drivers cars from scratches is more important than protecting pedestrians from getting hit, so they make the sidewalk part of the “clear zone”
Physical design is not neutral.
Physical design is an expression of our values.
They think protecting drivers cars from scratches is more important than protecting pedestrians from getting hit, so they make the sidewalk part of the “clear zone”
Physical design is not neutral.
Physical design is an expression of our values.
Your post wasn’t Irony, it was sarcasm.
how do you differentiate the two? (i thought it was neither, but i’m honestly curious about your reasoning
Because sarcasm in this case pointedly gets it wrong. It does so on purpose to convey absurdity (generally as a reply to something which the poster thinks is as equally absurd as their own statement)
The rail is definitely not put there to protect the trees, and then the absurdity of it is expounded upon by adding the zoo statement.
Nope.
https://www.yourdictionary.com/articles/irony-sarcasm-difference
So you’ve managed to look up the definition and STILL don’t understand. That’s pretty amazing on your part.
I was not having a go at the OP, and was providing a “wrong” answer, irony, not sarcasm, related, but not the same.
Sarcasm would be me having a go at your attempts at teaching me how to use English, which I won’t, since I’m not upset with you, just bemused at your assertions.
See now you’re getting it. Your post just now…
Irony.