Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?
Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.
Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?
Who are you referring to? I’m debating some “Harris needs to earn my vote. So it’s her fault if Trump wins.” idiots right now.
Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.
I’ve had a tag on the user I think you’re referencing for a minute now. It’s quite helpful.
Maybe a play on “omnipresent zealot”
Hmm. I can think of someone who was recently accused of running two accounts. Something like bad mythical figure name.
=)
It’s almost like people argue in bad faith on the internet. Fancy that!
I don’t know about you, but I’m saving this post for future citations.
how does this article impact anyone’s support for a 3rd party?