The deal includes $600bn (£446bn) of EU investments in the US, and the bloc will buy $750bn (£558bn) of US energy and also purchase American military equipment.

Mr Trump said: “I think it’s great that we made a deal today instead of playing games and maybe not making a deal at all.”

He said: “We are agreeing that the tariff… for automobiles and everything else will be a straight across tariff of 15%.” However, the 15% baseline rate would not apply to steel and aluminium, for which a 50% tariff would stay in place.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Europeans lose out on the profit. Thats what a tariff mainly does, divert the profits from the company to the government.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          The price of the import remains constant, maybe jumps a bit, but the costs rise. That means less profits and the cost is paid to the seppo government, hence my comment about diverting profits from europe to the seppo government.

          • Pyr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            If a company isn’t going to make a profit selling to America, they aren’t going to sell it.

            So the item the previously listed for $100 and made a $10 profit on, will now cost $115 for that same $10 profit. They won’t all of a sudden drop the price by $15 to keep the sale price at $100 and then take a $5 loss on each sale, they will simply stop selling the item or Americans will need to pay $115 for the item and the government gets $15 and the company still gets $10, but it’s still the Americans paying that $15 to the government, unless there is already a locally made item which sells for $105 then Americans will buy that instead and the European company can’t compete anymore and will stop selling their product and Americans have less choice in the stores.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Thats why i said less profits and not no profits. If they could have sold it for $115 they would have. There might be some price gouging using the tariffs as an excuse but its not gonna be such an effect across the board i dont think.

              What I was thinking of was an item with a >15% profit margin now being less but not necessarily unprofitable.

              If there is no profit to be made then yeah all the previous profits will go into the hostile countrys private sector since the gap is gonna be closed by domestic companies which is what trump means when he says that tariffs will bring jobs back.

        • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the product is 15% more expensive, it might push it over the threshold where it’s no longer the most competitive product, and a competitor gets the sale instead.

  • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Pretending like the EU is working for the interests of EU members: What exactly is the argument for giving them 500 milliard euro in aid, and agreeing to buy their inferior products for super critical uses? How big were the tariffs they were threatening without those outrageous gifts? How can von der Leyen and co. expect us to believe they could go any higher and still afford to buy any European products?

    China is selling higher quality energy equipment for a fraction of the price, and Russia is selling competitive military equipment for a fraction of the price. Not to mention the inherit security risk of buying foreign military equipment to begin with.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    How long before the EU stops complaining about the Chinese EV boom just to spite trump? I mean christ that one is at least extremely transparent… god this guy is an idiot.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Europe has a pretty sizable car industry, that’s why they’re concerned about Chinese EV’s.

    • Jack@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Our leaders are spineless… The US says jump and we jump it’s pathetic. I really wish the people of Europe organized more and put up stronger resistance because our leaders will not do shit.

      • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not just ideological or lack of authority, EU economy is deeply intertwined with US’s one: if your main ally turns his back on you, you’re in deep shit no matter what you do. I agree that harder times could be beneficial (other comment to yours), but try to survive Trumps legislation could also work. In my view, it’s the decades before this that prepared the field for trouble: both with Russia and USA, Europe has made itself too dependent on foreign countries (for energy and defense, core matters with regards to be strong on an international field)

          • Etnaphele@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I think this is excessive, the concept of ownership is on another level. But I get what you mean.

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              The usa effectively controls our subcontinents economy via energy. We are all but outright forbidden to buy from other nations such as russia, see e.g. nordstream 2. They who can destroy a thing own that thing.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        That would certainly help both sides of the Atlantic. We need to hurt for anything to change on our side.