The Secret War To Censor The Internet

The Secret War To Censor The Internet

Recent Lextorias video explains how a 2018 FOSTA-SESTA law amended protections to the Communications Decency Act, and immediately opened the flood gates for targeted harassment of payment processors for adult content censorship.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Handmaid’s Tale, was in turn, partly based on how Iran went from an absolute kingdom with a secular urban culture and lifestyle to a male-dominated theocracy.

    That the US began largely as a string of colonies run by religious officials, an arrangement those megalomaniacal evangelists are trying to bring back, those pricks literally believing they’re on “holy” land and must live up to it.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      But they left Europe in part to get away from church government. First amendment and all that. Most of them were religious but they wanted it out of government.

      • Triasha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some of them wanted it out of government. The fundies of the day we’re willing to go along because their parents and grandparents were chased out of England for being wackados.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The point is that they put the separation of church and state right into the constitution in the first amendment. The fact that they codified it as such, established that it was a primary principle they wanted for the nation’s foundational philosophy.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          They were not even the same religions as one-another, so that makes no sense. Also, there’s no basis for that idea.

            • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Well if you call putting it into the constitution “settling” for neutrality, then so be it, have whatever terminology you want. They didn’t want a theocracy, but the fundies of today would like nothing more than that.

              • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                No, they definitely wanted a theocracy, but none of them had the numbers for it to be the theocracy they wanted, so thry settled on a solution and made damn sure it wouldn’t be anyone elses theocracy by putting it in the constitution.

                Thats why it’s a ‘religiously neutral’ state with special privileges for religion, rather than a secular state with free exercise of religion where doing so does not violate laws-an idea proposed and shot down at the time.