• petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Get an electric car if you want, but you should still support society moving away from needing them in the first place, no?

      Imagine a school cafeteria is serving kids the option of 5 hershey’s chocolate bars, or a slice of pizza. You can acknowledge the pizza is better, but you should still be asking where the god damn vegetables are.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s pretty much exactly the point I was trying to make. Incremental improvements are better than no improvements.

        People shit on electric cars because they aren’t the perfect solution, ignoring the fact that they are better than what we have now.

        It took us 150 years to get in to this mess. We aren’t going to fix it completely overnight.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        How many people living on their rural property build their own roads to get there, as compared to relying on taxpayer subsidies?

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Running a grader over their many-kilometer unsealed dirt road once a year after the wet season is how a lot of rural places do it.

          If it’s roads on/within their own property they do have to pay for it (I cannot speak globally, but in Australia). If it’s on government land then of course it’s govt cost and responsibility.

          Trains are great for high density. They don’t make sense to small towns or widely-dispersed populations - electric vehicles will always be needed and it’s dumb to pretend one size fits all.