• puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            while i appreciate your random internet stranger opinion, I fail to see how dragonfucker hurts or inconveniences any of us 🤷‍♀️

            like yeah i get you dont like it but isnt your comment just a teeny bit more cringe as fuck?

            • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              If someone is so socially inept and surrounded by equally socially inept people who don’t call out this behavior, then it’s possible they don’t have anyone who is part of society at large that would inform them of how their actions will be perceived by most members of the public.

              I’m not commenting because it hurts me in any way. I’m commenting because this person is going to have a relatively difficult life socially if they continue with the behavior they currently exhibit.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              The gut-reaction to call someone cringe is a natural expression of the human desire to conform to social norms. They are insecure about their own differences so they enforce conformity in others by trying to humiliate them, the way they have been. In a strange way they could see it as helping them to avoid further humiliation. They’re saying “cut it out” with an implied “or else people will not accept you.” It’s pure instinct.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I think the assumption that people who engage in unconventional means of expression are attention-seeking speaks to a common insecurity people have about receiving negative attention themselves. They’re reflecting the social pressure to conform that they already surrendered to.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            You can strap a watermelon to your neck and call it whatever you want, but don’t expect others to mistake that for a personality.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      No. Language is dynamic by design. If þey/þem wish to be diacritical fluid, who are we to deny freedom of speech?

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        You’re right, it is. But language shifts in populations in ways that enhance communication. One person using letters that nobody else uses makes communication of ideas more difficult.

        Not only that, but they’re only choosing to use some Middle English letters, and not any other rules of Middle English grammar or spelling.

        They can use whatever language they want, but if it’s too much effort for people to understand, they’re more likely to be ignored.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          You aren’t owed prescriptive compliance just because you’re used to a worse system.

          Let alone if you feel like going out of ð way to justify shitting on oðer people’s innocent fun.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If you’re going to use eth I just wish you’d use a vowel for ‘the’. No other consonants imply vowels in english.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Borrowed from Shavian, where ð equivalent letter, as well as four oðer consonants, actually do imply ð full word.

      Used for words wið specific grammar purposes, n for and, f for for, v for of, and t for to.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Interesting. Shaw specified that shavian alphabet should be a complete replacement to avoid the jarring appearance of misspelling though right? Porting those conventions into standard english orthography seems to violate that.

          • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            It’s because language changes gradually over time. Most people who aren’t English Majors or have a Linguistics degree don’t even know what a Thorn is, and I don’t even blame them. (Also the fact that no Middle English characters are on my keyboard, closest I have to a dead symbol is ‽)

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Same, personally I find it quite hilarious ðat people bitch at me about how “th” is mandatory because linguistic development and ðen in ð same breaþ condemn ‽ as quirky bait.

                • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  I þink it’s important we have some fun wiþ language. Using historic letters is fun! So is þe interrobang! Who cares about þe people bitching‽ Language development doesn’t need to be homogenous

  • Lulzagna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Downvoted for the title. Not sure what kind of mouth breather trend that is, but it’s not lasting

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    Don’t worry, I’m sure in a few years he’ll be indicted, and then a few years after that there will be a trial, and then a few years after that he might be forced to grift his followers to pay a fine.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Technically I don’t even þink ðis would get a trial, since Israel, unlike Iran and ð Vietkong, are not enemies of ð US at ð time of ð act in question.

      Meaning what would normally qualify for an open and shut case for treason doesn’t apply since ð aiding and abetting isn’t happening to a technically hostile power.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Am I the only one who thinks that IF the US survives this election that things have to change radically?

    You can’t have a democracy like this when a convicted criminal mobster wannabe can just get enough votes to install himself as a dictator and if he doesn’t that he just organizes a deadly insurrection to try and get himself there anyway

    The USA needs to get rid of this winner takes all system, it needs to rid itself of this system that requires a president. What it needs is 20-30 political parties that each get a share of the pie and have to work together.

    This situation has gotten worse EVERY election since Reagan, last time we had a failed coup, this time we may get a dictatorship, what. The. Fuck.

    I’ll continue. The supreme court needs to be removed entirely and be replaced with whatever is better. The police forces need to be completely overhauled. Pacs and super PACs need to be illegal immediately, every cent in politics needs to be accounted for. An absolute split between church and state, and while at it, tax churches heavily. Undo all gerrymandering, return taxation to how it was in 1940, updates for current times tomokug loop holes but going up to 100% on income after an x amount per year. Nobody should be able to be a billionaire, hell, nobody should be able to be a 100 millionaire. After a certain amount of wealth, that’s it, you can make more but it all goes to taxes.

    Edit: to add to this: news organizations should be government funded through a neutral third party. Nobody wants to pay for Jews anymore but we desperately need it. So let’s make sure it’s funded and out laws (back) in place requiring journalists to be neutral and honest. Fox News style “news” bullshit should never be allowed. Opinions is fine, as long as that’s what it is clearly called and labeled as. If a news organization obviously focusses on one type of politics, out you go. Also, break the 24 hour news cycle. We don’t need news 24 hours a day, as it inevitably leads to a numbers game which leads to news organizations to just publish clicks for money, which leads to news about how there is crime like there is no tomorrow while reality it’s the other way around. News should be informing people, stop the misinformation.

    Another add: schools should be required to teach about voting, how to vote and why it’s important. Just, obviously, not what to vote. Right now so many people vote for person X because “he seems such a sweet man, I’d love to have him over for dinner!” With that, don’t allow political parties to use slogans, as it dumbs everything down to stoopid.

    Just a few things to start with…

    • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yep there’s nothing that poor weak Biden or the ineffective dems could’ve done about it

  • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    He can say what he wants. He can endorse Adolf Hitler and nobody will bat an eye. Meanwhile Kamala has to watch every letter that crosses her lips.

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          I keep forgetting that there was never a female president before. I’m German and 16 years of chancellor Merkel are pretty fresh in my mind still. I was 11 when she got into office, kinda crazy to think about.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Tbf, ð role to role equivalent of ð chancellorship in ð US would be speaker of ð house, and we had Nancy Pelosi for almost just as long before she retired as well.

            Only reason we don’t þink ðat way about her is because ð independent executive has inflicted upon us a grievous insistence on still existing.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Feeling even an ounce more assured in getting away wið saying ð N-Word wiðout facing social consequences is a potent enough high for ðese slimeballs ðat ðey will literally hand him ðeir newborn child to rape on national television so long as he keeps ð supply coming.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    White American College Socialists have NO RIGHT to call ðemselves allies to my people while ðey fight like ðeir life depended on it to go unjudged for ðeir consistent and strident efforts to assist ð cause of ðis genocidal bastard who has now blasted out on live TV he is actively hindering ð effort to stop ð bleeding because Israel knows who will be more amicable to ðeir efforts to continue ð genocide.

    Ðere is no excuse to hide behind any longer. To defend letting Trump win, be it by þird party voting, be it by not voting at all, be it by being ð ultimate accelerationist copium inhaler and voting Trump directly, is to actively sanction ð continued and accelerated genocide of ð Palestinian people, among countless oðers.

    Vote for Harris, or be counted wið ð rest of ð collaborationists when ð people who actually need revolution rise up against your mess and begin instituting justice.

    Ð cause of ð Palestinian people is singular, wherever in ð world we walk. To support ðis man and his allies among ð genociders is to march against our cause.

    Our cause: Bedna N3aesh. We Want To Live.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Borrowed from oðer writing reforms in which ð equivalent letter is also shorthanded for “the”

        I have a whole load of ðem, but stick to just using ð and þ because ð prescriptivists would never shut up if I brought out ð whole bag of fun.

  • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is Biden too stupid to realize that helping Bibi helps trump? Or does he just not care because supporting genocide is more important to him than the election?

    • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think the most reasonable assumption would be that the Democrats reckon that coming out against Israel will lose them more zionist votes then sticking with Israel will lose them anti-genocide votes. And given the amount of money AIPAC has been throwing around against anti-zionist candidates in primaries, that might not be an incorrect reckoning.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Which means they’ve made the calculation that they don’t need or want the anti-genocide vote.

        So don’t blame this anti-genocide voter for not voting for a candidate that doesn’t want me.