• zombie bubble kitty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            while i appreciate your random internet stranger opinion, I fail to see how dragonfucker hurts or inconveniences any of us 🤷‍♀️

            like yeah i get you dont like it but isnt your comment just a teeny bit more cringe as fuck?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              They’ve been inconveniencing me by following me around and harassing be because they didn’t understand my simple point that ‘they’ applies to all humans.

              They harassed me over calling Caillou ‘he.’ As in the cartoon toddler. Seriously.

              They also object to people using the word ‘you’ to address them, which is fucking stupid.

            • sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If someone is so socially inept and surrounded by equally socially inept people who don’t call out this behavior, then it’s possible they don’t have anyone who is part of society at large that would inform them of how their actions will be perceived by most members of the public.

              I’m not commenting because it hurts me in any way. I’m commenting because this person is going to have a relatively difficult life socially if they continue with the behavior they currently exhibit.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The gut-reaction to call someone cringe is a natural expression of the human desire to conform to social norms. They are insecure about their own differences so they enforce conformity in others by trying to humiliate them, the way they have been. In a strange way they could see it as helping them to avoid further humiliation. They’re saying “cut it out” with an implied “or else people will not accept you.” It’s pure instinct.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think the assumption that people who engage in unconventional means of expression are attention-seeking speaks to a common insecurity people have about receiving negative attention themselves. They’re reflecting the social pressure to conform that they already surrendered to.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You can strap a watermelon to your neck and call it whatever you want, but don’t expect others to mistake that for a personality.

    • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No. Language is dynamic by design. If þey/þem wish to be diacritical fluid, who are we to deny freedom of speech?

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re right, it is. But language shifts in populations in ways that enhance communication. One person using letters that nobody else uses makes communication of ideas more difficult.

        Not only that, but they’re only choosing to use some Middle English letters, and not any other rules of Middle English grammar or spelling.

        They can use whatever language they want, but if it’s too much effort for people to understand, they’re more likely to be ignored.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          You aren’t owed prescriptive compliance just because you’re used to a worse system.

          Let alone if you feel like going out of ð way to justify shitting on oðer people’s innocent fun.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Damn, Trump must be making Biden and Harris give unequivocal support to Netanyahu’s genocide too! The conspiracy goes deeper than I thought.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Don’t worry, I’m sure in a few years he’ll be indicted, and then a few years after that there will be a trial, and then a few years after that he might be forced to grift his followers to pay a fine.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Technically I don’t even þink ðis would get a trial, since Israel, unlike Iran and ð Vietkong, are not enemies of ð US at ð time of ð act in question.

      Meaning what would normally qualify for an open and shut case for treason doesn’t apply since ð aiding and abetting isn’t happening to a technically hostile power.

    • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep there’s nothing that poor weak Biden or the ineffective dems could’ve done about it

  • Lulzagna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Downvoted for the title. Not sure what kind of mouth breather trend that is, but it’s not lasting

    • Katrisia@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I remember a person on Reddit using this.

      þ- th sounding /θ/ (think)
      ð- th sounding /ð/ (the)

      As to why… I hope OP tells us.

        • apostrofail@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I support.

          Æsþetically it looks dense & unique like ð rare, sunderly dental fricative sounds English makes. “ð” isn’t historic since Old English really didn’t boðer ƿiþ separating voiced vs. unvoiced dental, but ðat’s okay since our broðers up norþ in Iceland use ðese 2 characters in ð manner you prescribe. I like ð mirroring a as ð single-character definite vs. indefinite article too. As someone around ESL (English as a second language) speakers, it can help ðem not only knoƿ hƿich sound to make hƿile preventing silly slip-ups like former US president Donald Trump saying Þighland instead of Thailand—but it ƿould be obvious if our ƿritten form ƿasn’t forced to drop þorn for overloading “y” or “th” for ð printing press’ limitations not built for our tongue.

          Before computers or printing presses, ƿe didn’t have spellcheck—so folks spelled ƿords as ðey sound. Having less digraphs favoring more single characters is considered more ergonomic; Dvorak, ð keyboard layout, has “ht” on the home roƿ of ð dominant hand to shoƿ just hoƿ dominant ðis digraph truly is for typing English.

          • Mr. Satan@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Look, english spelling is already a mess for me to parse (non-native speaker). If y’all start using this other alphabet, I’m just not gonna bother reading.

            “Oh no! Anyway” kind of comment, but I must protest somehow.

            • apostrofail@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ban ñ from Spanish! My language does not have this character!

              Non-native speakers tend to mess up dental fricatives in speech as is. This usage is a good reminder as a character for a sound your language doesn’t have… a lot of languages “th” is pronounced as English “t” which implies aspiration like in Thomas. It is just like learning any other non-Romantic language & is literally in Icelandic—not some made-up character.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Is a fucked up sense of outrage supposed to make you look internet cool? Hey check me out, I’m acting more concerned about something stupid the OP did than I am about the alarming content they just shared, isn’t my personality so edgy?

      And announcing your downvote, you’re like the reincarnation of Oscar Wilde over there.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s not a trend. The way you and drag are speaking is the trend. Phlubbadubba is speaking Old English. You’re right, though, it didn’t last.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Am I the only one who thinks that IF the US survives this election that things have to change radically?

    You can’t have a democracy like this when a convicted criminal mobster wannabe can just get enough votes to install himself as a dictator and if he doesn’t that he just organizes a deadly insurrection to try and get himself there anyway

    The USA needs to get rid of this winner takes all system, it needs to rid itself of this system that requires a president. What it needs is 20-30 political parties that each get a share of the pie and have to work together.

    This situation has gotten worse EVERY election since Reagan, last time we had a failed coup, this time we may get a dictatorship, what. The. Fuck.

    I’ll continue. The supreme court needs to be removed entirely and be replaced with whatever is better. The police forces need to be completely overhauled. Pacs and super PACs need to be illegal immediately, every cent in politics needs to be accounted for. An absolute split between church and state, and while at it, tax churches heavily. Undo all gerrymandering, return taxation to how it was in 1940, updates for current times tomokug loop holes but going up to 100% on income after an x amount per year. Nobody should be able to be a billionaire, hell, nobody should be able to be a 100 millionaire. After a certain amount of wealth, that’s it, you can make more but it all goes to taxes.

    Edit: to add to this: news organizations should be government funded through a neutral third party. Nobody wants to pay for Jews anymore but we desperately need it. So let’s make sure it’s funded and out laws (back) in place requiring journalists to be neutral and honest. Fox News style “news” bullshit should never be allowed. Opinions is fine, as long as that’s what it is clearly called and labeled as. If a news organization obviously focusses on one type of politics, out you go. Also, break the 24 hour news cycle. We don’t need news 24 hours a day, as it inevitably leads to a numbers game which leads to news organizations to just publish clicks for money, which leads to news about how there is crime like there is no tomorrow while reality it’s the other way around. News should be informing people, stop the misinformation.

    Another add: schools should be required to teach about voting, how to vote and why it’s important. Just, obviously, not what to vote. Right now so many people vote for person X because “he seems such a sweet man, I’d love to have him over for dinner!” With that, don’t allow political parties to use slogans, as it dumbs everything down to stoopid.

    Just a few things to start with…

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah we have to outgrow the POV that says putting limits on wealth equals communism, or means no freedom. Democracy loses its meaning if kings can live inside it - which is what we get if wealth gives individuals more power than the rest of society. We’re on course back to the age of aristocrat landowners and tenant farmers. That’s not human progress, that’s degeneration. To me the slogan, “We won’t go back!” means a lot more than avoiding another Trump administration. It means recharting the course of our society away from a nobles vs peasants world and toward a world of true equality. It will take changes that are much more fundamental than imposing taxes on wealth. We have to de-legitimize extreme wealth and disable the huge leverage it gives a few people over the rest of us.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    On one hand, I agree with you

    On the other hand, Jesus Christ didn’t the Middle English fad die out in like, 2013 Reddit?

    • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      And you should be glad it did. Germans didnt get so lucky.

      r/ich_iel and [email protected] STILL think it’s funny not to use english words and instead translate them literally so it sounds like complete nonsense. (“Zangendeutsch”) This joke got old like 10 years ago but if you use even a single english word you will still be greeted with “Sprich Deutsch du Hurensohn” which means speak German you son of a bitch.

      I just want good memes in my own language, but that community is insufferable.

      /rant, sorry

        • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I keep forgetting that there was never a female president before. I’m German and 16 years of chancellor Merkel are pretty fresh in my mind still. I was 11 when she got into office, kinda crazy to think about.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Tbf, ð role to role equivalent of ð chancellorship in ð US would be speaker of ð house, and we had Nancy Pelosi for almost just as long before she retired as well.

            Only reason we don’t þink ðat way about her is because ð independent executive has inflicted upon us a grievous insistence on still existing.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Feeling even an ounce more assured in getting away wið saying ð N-Word wiðout facing social consequences is a potent enough high for ðese slimeballs ðat ðey will literally hand him ðeir newborn child to rape on national television so long as he keeps ð supply coming.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    So true liberal bestie, democrats are better because they silently sends billions to israel to carry out genocide while trump can’t keep his stupid mouth shut.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you’re going to use eth I just wish you’d use a vowel for ‘the’. No other consonants imply vowels in english.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Borrowed from Shavian, where ð equivalent letter, as well as four oðer consonants, actually do imply ð full word.

      Used for words wið specific grammar purposes, n for and, f for for, v for of, and t for to.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Interesting. Shaw specified that shavian alphabet should be a complete replacement to avoid the jarring appearance of misspelling though right? Porting those conventions into standard english orthography seems to violate that.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Meh, why waste a perfectly usable convention when you’re not gonna use ð alphabet it was originally used in?

          • Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s because language changes gradually over time. Most people who aren’t English Majors or have a Linguistics degree don’t even know what a Thorn is, and I don’t even blame them. (Also the fact that no Middle English characters are on my keyboard, closest I have to a dead symbol is ‽)

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Same, personally I find it quite hilarious ðat people bitch at me about how “th” is mandatory because linguistic development and ðen in ð same breaþ condemn ‽ as quirky bait.

                • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I þink it’s important we have some fun wiþ language. Using historic letters is fun! So is þe interrobang! Who cares about þe people bitching‽ Language development doesn’t need to be homogenous

      • muix@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        What makes you choose þ or ð? In Icelandic it’s the difference between voiced and voiceless.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    White American College Socialists have NO RIGHT to call ðemselves allies to my people while ðey fight like ðeir life depended on it to go unjudged for ðeir consistent and strident efforts to assist ð cause of ðis genocidal bastard who has now blasted out on live TV he is actively hindering ð effort to stop ð bleeding because Israel knows who will be more amicable to ðeir efforts to continue ð genocide.

    Ðere is no excuse to hide behind any longer. To defend letting Trump win, be it by þird party voting, be it by not voting at all, be it by being ð ultimate accelerationist copium inhaler and voting Trump directly, is to actively sanction ð continued and accelerated genocide of ð Palestinian people, among countless oðers.

    Vote for Harris, or be counted wið ð rest of ð collaborationists when ð people who actually need revolution rise up against your mess and begin instituting justice.

    Ð cause of ð Palestinian people is singular, wherever in ð world we walk. To support ðis man and his allies among ð genociders is to march against our cause.

    Our cause: Bedna N3aesh. We Want To Live.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Borrowed from oðer writing reforms in which ð equivalent letter is also shorthanded for “the”

        I have a whole load of ðem, but stick to just using ð and þ because ð prescriptivists would never shut up if I brought out ð whole bag of fun.

  • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is Biden too stupid to realize that helping Bibi helps trump? Or does he just not care because supporting genocide is more important to him than the election?

    • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think the most reasonable assumption would be that the Democrats reckon that coming out against Israel will lose them more zionist votes then sticking with Israel will lose them anti-genocide votes. And given the amount of money AIPAC has been throwing around against anti-zionist candidates in primaries, that might not be an incorrect reckoning.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Which means they’ve made the calculation that they don’t need or want the anti-genocide vote.

        So don’t blame this anti-genocide voter for not voting for a candidate that doesn’t want me.

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’ve probably also figured out how many people saying that will actually fold with a little arm twisting. Would be super interesting to see those numbers.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          And in doing so, you are hanging out to dry LGBTQ+, women, racial minorities, anyone working for minimum wage, anyone with health insurance, thousands of federal employees, the people of Ukraine, and when it really comes down to it, the people of Gaza.

          There is no anti-genocide option on the table. Not in any meaningful way. It’s not a real choice at all, to be honest, but the direction is clear.

          • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Imagine if all those people stood together against genocide instead of dividing over it. Women alone are like half the population… Why are they siding with genocide? They could elect anyone they want. Anyone with health insurance? That’s almost everyone. Bam, anyone they want. If a gay person votes for genocide how much should I really give a shit about them? There’s no “meaningful choice” because the libs get out early saying so… But if it’s not this election then certainly by the next one, millennials and zoomers are gonna be done with the old boomer parties… And good riddance

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I can imagine. Let’s say all these groups unanimously decided not to vote for democrats. Then they ask who they do vote for.

              Feminists vote for the best feminist candidate they can find. BLM votes for the best civil rights candidate they can find. LGBTQ people vote for the queerist person they can find. None of them support genocide, but none of them are voting for the same person.

              Now Trump wins with the vote split 40/20/20/20. Great job, we overwhelmingly voted against genocide and it only got worse.

              There is no anti-genocide option on the table. It is not a real choice.