TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israel’s decision to take over Gaza City was met with resignation and defiance by Palestinians who have survived two years of war and repeated raids. Many Israelis responded with fear and anger, worried it could be a death sentence for hostages held in Gaza.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Friday that Israel would intensify its 22-month war with Hamas by taking over Gaza City, large parts of which have been destroyed by past bombardment and ground incursions.

A major ground operation is almost sure to cause more mass displacement and worsen an already catastrophic humanitarian crisis.

“What does (Israel) want from us? … There is nothing here to occupy,” said a woman in Gaza City who identified herself as Umm Youssef. “There is no life here. I have to walk every day for more than 15 minutes to get drinking water.”

Ruby Chen, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen whose son, Itay, is a hostage held in Gaza, told The Associated Press that the decision puts the remaining hostages in danger.

“What is the plan now that is different from the last 22 months?” he said.

  • fif-t@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hamas has made an offer of surrendering completely, returning the prisoners of war (as well as any hostages) and leaving forever in exchange for a Palestinian state. Israel has repeatedly rejected that deal. I wonder why?

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hamas has made an offer of surrendering completely, returning the prisoners of war (as well as any hostages) and leaving forever in exchange for a Palestinian state

      Source

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hamas Member of Parliament Khalil al-Hayya, also deputy chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau, told the Associated Press in April 2024 that Hamas is willing to agree to a truce of five years or more with Israel and that it would lay down its weapons and convert into a political party if an independent Palestinian state is established along pre-1967 borders.

        - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas#7_Oct_2023–present

        Hamas’s goal has been a Palestinian state for years now. Also, Hamas had already agreed to give back the hostages and not rebuild its military capabilities in Trump’s January ceasefire; it was Israel who reneged on that like it has reneged on every other ceasefire agreement it has ever signed.

        • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          Pre-1967 borders include most of Jerusalem and the 4 holiest Jewish sites. Imagine if Israel said they would offer peace in exchange for Mecca and Medina.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Your attempt to derail the conversation because the facts aren’t on your side has been noticed, but I’ll bite.

            There are about a hundred and one different ways one could solve this problem. For example, Israel could have custodianship over the relevant holy sites like Jordan does over the Temple Mount. For another, any kind of agreement could be worked out to let Israeli citizens visit these sites (as long as Palestinians are allowed to visit the Temple Mount). Alternatively, we could decide that this all makes no sense for a hundred different reasons and go for a one-state solution with no borders in historical Palestine. Point being: This is not and has never been a serious hurdle towards peace, only an excuse. In serious peace negotiations in the near future, Israel’s position would be so strong as to make getting such concessions from the Palestinian side trivial. I should point out, though, that it’s far from guaranteed that this will be the case in fifteen or twenty years; at that point Israel would be forced to make concessions that actually hurt.

            • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              You are still defending Hamas. They have never offered or agreed to any plausible peace deal. They have only made demands in order to keep the fighting going.

              Israel has released 100s of prisoners, including violent terrorists who murdered peace activists. That’s dozens of times more individuals than Hamas has released or ever agreed to release.

              Israel has offered safe passage to friendly countries for Hamas leadership to step down and release remaining hostages.

              In the end I believe you are right that Israel will have to make even more painful concessions if they continue down this path. Hamas has demonstrated that they will fight to the last man no matter how many Palestinians have to suffer or die while they hide in their tunnels and continue to torture their hostages.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                I see you’re desperate to derail the conversation again now that your first attempt has failed. It’s painfully obvious and does your monstrosity of a cause no good, so you should consider stopping. I won’t dignify this with a response since you and everyone else reading this knows exactly what I was going to say, but I’ll just note that in the comment you’re responding to, the word “Hamas” appears exactly zero times.

                • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Maybe too many people have blocked you or something, so I’m not sure if you just can’t see that Hamas is the entire discussion of this thread from the first comments.

                  It’s no surprise to me that someone would fling accusations rather than responding with anything substantive, although that’s not me. I’ve made the point, and provided widely available and globally relied upon sources. You have replied with name calling and rhetoric, so I am okay with your decision not to respond. Probably better for both of us.

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Internstional law say that all lands stolen by israel in 67 is palestinians. They csn visit thosr sites as forrigner or accept a one state solution

          • noMoreTwat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Mecca and Medina aren’t in Palestine. It might include “most of Jerusalem” but it’s the border recognized by international laws. Fact don’t care about your feelings

          • fif-t@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Imagine a bunch of foreigners coming in, and deciding that the majority of your farmable land should belong to them.

            Oh wait, I don’t have to. That’s how Israel was created.

            I’d prefer pre-1947 borders but pre-1967 is better than nothing.

          • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s the same fucking cult anyway, only different sects. They can share. Oh wait, religious people are immature children so they literally can’t.

            • fif-t@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If only it were about religion (hint: it’s never been about religion)

              • AstaKask@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Religion is crucial to making people not question authority, to make them ignore what they hear and what they see, to make them feel not responsible for their actions. Submission is incredibly dangerous, and it’s what the whole cult of Yahweh is founded on.

                • fif-t@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Except Zionism was started by secular Jews and Zionists today are mostly Evangelical Christians. Israel and its creation has always been colonial and not religious. Religion is mostly a fig leaf/cover for it.

                  To paraphrase from Ilan Pappe, “Most Zionists don’t believe in God, but they believe God promised them Israel”

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Al-Hayya said Hamas does not regret the Oct. 7 attacks, despite the destruction it has brought down on Gaza and its people. He denied that Hamas militants had targeted civilians during the attacks — despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary — and said the operation succeeded in its goal of bringing the Palestinian issue back to the world’s attention.

          Damn they really don’t give a shit about their own civilians, just fodder for western leftists

          The worst thing for Israel is dead Palestinian children

          The best thing for Hamas is dead Palestinian children

          • mrdown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The worst thing for Israel is dead Palestinian children

            They want all palestinians gone

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 days ago

              no they don’t lol

              there’s 2.2 million of them in a space the size of Manhattan, if they wanted to genocide them they could have done it 1000x over by now

              Over a span of around 100 days, members of the Tutsi ethnic group, as well as some moderate Hutu and Twa, were systematically killed by Hutu militias. While the Rwandan Constitution states that over 1 million people were killed, most scholarly estimates suggest between 500,000 and 800,000 Tutsi died, mostly men.[5][6][7] The genocide was marked by extreme violence, with victims often murdered by neighbours, and widespread sexual violence, with between 250,000 and 500,000 women raped

              and they did it mainly with machettes

              that is a genocide

              • fif-t@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Genocide isn’t about the number of deaths. It’s about the intent.

                If you listen to what Israelis and Israeli leaders are saying, and the pattern of actions, it fits the definition of genocide.

                In previous cases of genocide, explicit statements of intent wasn’t required to call it as such (and we have them this time), as the actions and patterns of behaviour were enough to ascribe intent.

                In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

                1 Killing members of the group;

                2 Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

                3 Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

                4 Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

                5 Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

                Only one of the list needs to be fulfilled in order to be considered genocide. 1, 2, and 3 have been demonstrated. With intent.

                Even if we put genocide aside, you cannot deny the ethnic cleansing aspect.

                • ikt@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed

                  I don’t care for any legal definition tbh, if anything trying to check boxes (with the icj quoting tweets? how low will we go :\ ) it feels like the word has been completely watered down from meaning I’m going to go door to door, house to house and kill every single one of you, I’m going to cut you into pieces, rape your wife and children then cut them into pieces, I’m going to capture you, put you and everyone you know on trains, torture you, and then gas you until not one of your people are left…to whatever Gaza is…

                  Even if we put genocide aside, you cannot deny the ethnic cleansing aspect.

                  There’s definitely war crimes in there from both sides, Israel is not doing itself any favours taking out an apartment building to take out 1 to 2 hamas members, that’s a bit cold, it’s why I’m surprised the palestinians haven’t risen up and killed every hamas member out there as surely they must recognise hamas are radioactive

                  Hundreds join Gaza’s largest anti-Hamas protest since war began

                  The protests in northern Gaza came a day after Islamic Jihad gunmen launched rockets at Israel, prompting an Israeli decision to evacuate large parts of Beit Lahia, which sparked public anger in the area.

                  https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g71lk09npo

                  But nothing really major since then?

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Gaza_Strip_anti-Hamas_protests

                  I just wish this shitshow was over so we can go back to focusing on Ukraine :(

                  • fif-t@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You’re clearly blind, not because you can’t see the atrocities being committed but because you either don’t want to or don’t care to.

                    I’m done trying to convince you of anything.

                  • mrdown@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    You don’t care about the legal definition because you are a savage who don’t believe in international laws and civilized societies

                    You claim to be against extremism while defending jewish extremism

              • mrdown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Learn the definition of genocide first instead of embarassing your self. Why netenyahu call the west bank as judea when judea was destroyed thousands of year ago? Why they build settlements in palestinians lands, why they stsrve gazans, why did he compare all gazans to amalek? Why israel destroy all palestinians historical sites? Why does honest israelis ask palestinians to live in egypt?