And that’s a term we haven’t applied but can apply now to technically good art following the common trends at the time, yet lacking something interesting to it, e.g. numerous portraits, template studies et cetera
And that’s a term we haven’t applied but can apply now to technically good art following the common trends at the time, yet lacking something interesting to it, e.g. numerous portraits, template studies et cetera
In music this tracks. There is the meta, the stadium shows and radio plays. Some good but I can’t tell how they are any better than other bands, some worse in some hard to define way, I think maybe in appealing to so many people, while it must have some quality, it also has to lack some quality though? Art shouldn’t be able to please everyone, I guess. If I can’t hate it while someone else loves it, is it art?