I recently learned that voting on lemmy is not anonymous. Anyone can get information about who has upvoted and downvoted a post or comment.

In combination with your IP, this is a massive privacy (maybe even physical security) risk. Also, people can target you for your votes.

Sadly, this is something where I would prefer Reddit over Lemmy. Big tech scrapes data from both places anyways, at least Reddit is safe.

  • Dholi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    at least Reddit is safe.

    Lmao, what!? Reddit tries their best to know exactly who you are, where you live, your education, where you work, etc… And then they sell that data to anyone.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    A lot of people here still refuse to understand that Lemmy, as it currently exists, is a privacy nightmare, and the voting thing is just the top of the iceberg. There are several de-anonymization attacks possible involving dynamically serving different content to different users. This, combined with the public voting makes it possible that someone can dox an account and expose a lot more information than other forums where that information is more private.

    Public votes also open the fediverse up to much worse astroturfing IMO. It’s incredible feedback for bots and trolls to see exactly who is interacting with their posts and comments. It’s frustrating that a bunch of people here have convinced themselves of the opposite, and insist that public voting is the only way to combat brigades and trolls, which is an incredibly shortsighted stance which doesn’t scale nearly as well as it does in the other direction.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      iirc someone got banned from like 25 subs because they downvoted a single post that said “I want YOU to generate more AI slop” and the mod got pissed and power tripped super hard

    • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What do you mean by dox here? I usually think of dox as being, real name, real address, etc. But I’m having trouble seeing how even my Lemmy instance admin could figure that out about me.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Nobody sets out to be doxxed, but it happens. And as it stands on the fediverse, when it happens the consequences are potentially even greater because all activity is available to all subscribers. All I am asking is for these simple facts to be acknowledged when we have this discussion. The potential risk profile for using Lemmy is greater than reddit in many ways. My frustration with how people approach this conversation is that they all too frequently dismiss or ignore this simple fact.

        It doesn’t need to be like this though. There are simple ways to mitigate this, but people are weirdly hostile to them, and I believe it is specifically because they do not acknowledge this additional risk.

  • Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ll downvote everyone here if I damn well please it!!!

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I try not to downvote without commenting so they should be aware

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      this is the way. I HATE when people downvote for no reason and don’t even attempt to have a conversation about it

      edit: goddamn it you goofballs 😂

      • morphballganon@mtgzone.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 minutes ago

        I’ll downvote something if it is irrelevant to the community at hand, or if someone creates a community specifically to bypass community blocks users have made. We don’t need 10 communities about the same thing, and users should absolutely be penalized for making superfluous communities to evade community blocks.

  • omniman@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    whats the problem with it . you did not liked it you downvoted . its not like they can ban your account

  • Xylight@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you’re an instance admin, for any post, you can just click “view votes” and see everything tied to usernames, even outside your own instance. Moderators can too, but it’s restricted to the communities they moderate.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      So if a bad actor wanted to get aces to vote data, they could setup and instance and have it federate with any instance they want to extract voting data from?

      • Xylight@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes, it’s very simple too. You don’t even need to extract anything from a database or do some complicated stuff. As an admin you have free access to all moderation tools no matter where the post is from, including the option to “view votes”.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The IP address thing is not real, though

    Just choose a nickname that is random word+4 random digits and don’t reuse it on other services

    • npdean@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It is nowhere explicitly made clear to users that voting is public. It should be made clear if it is going to be

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        An EU resident could sue for emotional damages under the GDPR. Or maybe just complain to data protection authorities.

        One day it will happen.

      • dirtydocmark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Why would it need to be made clear? Likes on Facebook are public, nowhere does it say “liking this photo will alert every friend you have that you just liked your stepdaughters’ friends’ bikini pic from 2 years ago.”

        I like the public vote system. Anonymous systems have a much greater potential for abuse.

        Accounts are easy enough to make that you can just burn your account every few months if you’re that worried.

        • zeca@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think its a fair assumption that most people make that whatever data which isnt explicitly displayed to a regular user is not public. Having likes be public but hidden is misleading.

        • npdean@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It is made clear because there is an option to see all the votes right next to the like button. Similarly, many sites allow you to go through activity of people you follow.

          • dirtydocmark@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            You can see the number of votes here too. Why does your hand need to be held? It’s the fucking internet, guy.

            • npdean@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I can see the number of votes but not who voted. This gives the impression that this information is not available publicly. However, it can be accessed by anyone on third party websites.

              • dirtydocmark@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Then don’t vote? Nobody is forcing you to interact with the content and it’s kind of hilarious you’d consider it a security/privacy violation.

                And then you put the cherry on top by saying “reddit is safe.”

      • gazby@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s the other way around here: Everything is public except where it’s made clear that it won’t be (e.g. email address, password).

        For what it’s worth, your instance of choice is particularly negligent in regard to informing its users. Compare lemmy.today/legal to lemmy.world/legal, or their respective signup pages for examples. There’s little that Lemmy itself or the community at large can do about that 😞

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    In combination with your IP, this is a massive privacy (maybe even physical security) risk. Also, people can target you for your votes.

    No.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It would be unusual to be able to exactly identify someone purely from their IP, but let’s say someone posted from their work IP in a small company. It would substantially lower the bar to dox them.

      Let’s go further and ponder if an authoritarian regime setup an admin and started coorelating dissent ip’s collected from user when they did things like paying parking fines, or signing their online tax forms.

      Let’s say that they collected all that and trained an LLM on it, then when you go to get a passport renewed or are stopped for a traffic violation and ask the LLM if you’re a dangerous person based on their criteria.

      It’s not a direct problem, but it has slippery slope all over it.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          ohh, so you can’t put train a small compendium everything a person wrote then infer things about that person based on their life. Good to know.

          I’ve been dealing with IP’s for about 30 year now, also good to know.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        IP addresses are not something that can be pulled from just any instance. You would need to be the administrator, and even then you’d only get access to the ip address of just your own instance users. AFAIK, at least - maybe they’ve made efforts to mask ips, too, but im not even sure how that’d work.

        Federated posts and comments are copied from server to server. When someone from .world is looking at a comment from .dbzer0, what they are seeing is information that was synced from the dbzer0 server address, not the user’s.

        There was a brief moment when there was a vulnerability with linked images sent via DM that could route you to an external server and log your IP address, but that has been patched now by most instances.

        As with anything on the internet: assume your activity is not private at all times, or take active precautions to mask your identity, or both. No opsec is perfect and often the only thing standing in the way of a hack or dox is the endurance and motivation of the bad actor.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          IP addresses are not something that can be pulled from just any instance.

          That’s what I thought about votes too. I’d be very happy to know that you can’t access ips the same way you can votes on other nodes by simply being an admin on a given node. Honestly, I never would have guessed lemvotes could exist.

    • moseschrute@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You get 3 accounts. Say you want to upvote something. You downvote in 1 account (randomly selected), upvote on another, and upvote on the third. So it’s net +1 and the only way to see how you voted is to piece together all 3 of your accounts voting history. Need more privacy? No problem, just use 5 accounts instead of 3.

      /s

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I did this last night putting my son to bed, said heads you go to bed, tails we stay up. Jokes on him though, double heads. And he fell for it, what a sucker. Hope it works when he’s not four, or I at least don’t need to do it.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems like a good thing to me. Should be a better known feature.

    How would I go about seeing this information for myself?

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah, at worst it’s a necessary evil to prevent a rogue user on a second instance from mass downvoting. Your username is tied to your vote, because otherwise a rogue user could just spam downvotes at whatever they didn’t like.

      Instance 1 has a post. Instance 2 has a user who disagrees with that post. User is able to spam downvotes, because instance 2 is not binding their username to the vote. So Instance 1 has no way of knowing if the votes are multiple different users, or all one user. The only real solution here is to disable external voting, but the entire point of the fediverse is cross-compatibility and self-hosting. By binding the username to the vote, instance 1 is able to detect repeat votes and disregard them.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Public votes do absolutely nothing to stop people from making a bunch of users on a bunch of instances and voting from those users. Voting agents are a simple solution to the issue, since you can still just ban the voting agent if it seems problematic.

        But there’s a deeper context here, which is we are drawing a weird line between voting being a fundamental, if not critical part of the application, but also apparently grounds for imposing sanctions on users for doing it wrong? That’s a fundamentally flawed mechanic no matter how you swing it, since you can’t standardize any singular set of rules, and we are already seeing a rapid escalation of tit for tat vote bans. This is just unsustainable and is pushing things towards an obvious endpoint where there is such a chilling effect on voting that it negates the entire utility of the mechanic for sorting and content curation.

      • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Important to note here, too, is that ip addresses of users arent synced across instances.

        This is only a problem for people who care about the reputation of their user account - which is something people should be rotating out anyway if they care about their privacy.

  • jason@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Russia really should just leave Ukraine, though. (Sorry, I just saw the context for this a few minutes ago and can’t help myself).