Hi everyone!
Itās me again)
For those who havenāt heard of it yet - VOID is a local-first, open-source āsecond brainā app. Think of it as combining the flexibility of Obsidian with the structured organization of Notion.
As the title says - VOID just reached 100 stars on GitHub!
Huge thanks for all your support - it truly motivates me to work even harder and bring the project to release as soon as possible.
But this post isnāt only about āshowing off.ā Over the past week Iāve mainly been polishing the editorās behavior, and now Iām finally happy with it. I think itās time to share the roadmap for the next year(I think?):
-
Note linking, global indexing of todos and tags, and embedded content (videos, images, audio, etc.)
-
Migration from Excalidraw canvas to a custom JSON Canvas implementation
-
Databases (similar to Notion)
-
Sync server improvements and a self-hosted Docker container
-
Plugin API (Lua for the backend and any frontend framework you can imagine)
-
Full redesign of the entire app (yes, we finally have a designer!)
-
And of courseā¦ optimization, optimization, optimization
We also now have a Lemmy community where Iāll post small devlogs, thoughts, and some behind-the-scenes updates about VOID. If youāre interested in the project, feel free to join there ā or hop into our GitHub Discussions.
GitHub
And one more thing - the first beta is coming very soon!
Stay tuned!
Youāre really a chummy type, arenāt ya?
Youāre much kinder than I. I think the term āself-centered arseholeā applies here.
You donāt see the humor in you having said, āDo you want me to explain it like Iām five?ā
I thought it was funny. And thatās why they replied the way they did. You were also being very snarky. And who wants assistance from someone being snarky?
This is definitely a both sides are wrong argument. /2Ā¢
ELI5 is a pretty established thing thatās self-evident.
Your comment just now is entirely true, but you completely missed the point.
The funny part is, you basically offered to talk like a child when explaining.
I wasnāt snarky to begin with, and I donāt owe anyone politeness.
āIām sorry you werenāt able to understand itā¦ā, sounds snarky as hell. Thatās victim blaming. The original comment they replied to was indeed a bunch of mumbo jumbo.
This is my original comment: https://threadiverse.link/lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/16113252
Yes, of course. And they they replied to acknowledge they were being reductive, and then explained their exasperation at the original comment (which was not from you). I donāt see anything particularly wrong with that, and then you made a pretty condescending reply. Thatās OK. You donāt always need to be polite. Lord knows Iām not. But it was coincidentally kinda funny! I laughed at it, myself. You literally said, āwould you like me to explain it like Iām fiveā, which is just so silly! I wish you could see the humor in it.
So I think their deadpan reply of āNo, an explanation like you were five wouldnāt improve upon OP.ā is an excellent and appropriately snarky reply that points out the silliness of what you said while also returning your snark back to you.
Have a most excellent day!