Stamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agoJust makes senselemmy.worldimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down176
arrow-up1356arrow-down1imageJust makes senselemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoWhat exactly does it mean to be a “profile” of ISO-8601?
minus-squarenibbler@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 hours agoI’m just making it up as I type, but I’d say it’s within the iso frame but more specific
minus-squareqaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-210 hours agoRFC3339 allows certain things that ISO8601 doesn’t, like leaving out the T
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-29 hours agoRight … what makes it a “profile” exactly? From what I can find they define a profile as profile - subset of features described in a standard or a set of standards How is it a subset if it actually contradicts the standard? ( by using a space instead of T or no separator between date and time)
What exactly does it mean to be a “profile” of ISO-8601?
I’m just making it up as I type, but I’d say it’s within the iso frame but more specific
RFC3339 allows certain things that ISO8601 doesn’t, like leaving out the T
Right … what makes it a “profile” exactly?
From what I can find they define a profile as
How is it a subset if it actually contradicts the standard? ( by using a space instead of T or no separator between date and time)