Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

  • dustyData@lemmy.worldEnglish
    818·
    9 hours ago

    The channel hat always been disingenuous. It’s not the first video they have where they develop a well written essay that has conclusions that make no sense with the information presented. It’s the theater of research without any of the substance. The editors just do whatever they want, under the expectations that the writing team will support their preconceived notion.

    They’re an entertainment channel, not a science communication channel. They have said some awful, totally not fact supported stuff in the past.

      • dustyData@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 hours ago

        Climate change whitewashing for corporations with awful conflicts of interest. Others have posted the links to the videos elsewhere in this comment section.

    • BreadstickNinja@lemmy.worldEnglish
      110·
      7 hours ago

      As far as science channels go, you’ve got SpaceTime for college students, Veritasium for high schoolers, and Kurzgesagt for newborn infants or maybe a smart dog. It’s probably at about the right level if you want to explain science to an Australian Shepherd.