Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I watched this with my son last night. Quite enjoyed it. I find the cadences of the narrator’s voice oddly soothing, although ironically it sounds very like an AI voice.

    • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You can’t really call it slop just because you disagree with their views and representations of things.

      Their stuff is carefully researched and sourced, human crafted and open to critique. Whether they’re correct in their assessments or not is of course up for debate, but it’s good craftsmanship and they show their work.

  • Kissaki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I feel like the title doesn’t match the content.

    The video gives an elaborate description on their evaluation of “AI” and it’s influence on the Internet at large. And then they conclude with “we’ll continue like before” directly contradicting the title.

    Feels disingenuous. And ironic after they talked about their extensive investments into fact checking.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      Do you think if we pool every AI in the world it will be able to figure out the difference between its and it’s? Seems unlikely.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Their quality going down is probably what’s killing their channel. Every video is a merch ad, and the occasional shilling for the fossil fuel industry probably doesn’t help any.

    These things are to be expected when you get bought by private equity, but let’s not be dishonest and say it’s all AI slop that’s killing them.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        38
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They accepted, and continue to accept a great amount of money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. That foundation owns over $11 billion in investments in the fossil fuel industry, including coal-burning utility companies.

        In return, there were quite a few videos that Kurzgesagt admits were funded directly by the Foundation, that exaggerate the positive influence corporations owned by the foundation have had. Videos which the CEO of Kurzgesagt has admitted they probably would not have made if the Foundation had not paid for them.

        • blakemiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          91
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s really embarrassing that we as a community have chosen, of all possible creators, to deride Kurzgesagt for taking money from The Gates Foundation. It’s 0.05% of their holdings. ZERO POINT ZERO FIVE. Which, by the way, is down from 6% in the past after public concern — yes, a whopping 6%. Scourge of the earth, locked out of heaven: The Gates Foundation. Those computer nerds strike again. And we choose to punish a great content contributor for that. Shameful display of purity politics.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The problem is when the contributors influence what the videos say, in contradiction to data.

            Kurzgesagt’s video on +2° / +3° / +4° over the global mean isn’t going to be so bad video was conspicuous to me, and is in fact, based on fossil-fuel industry rhetoric, rather than climatology estimations (which tell us over +1.5° is going to fuck us, and is).

          • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yeah. It seems like a ridiculous accusation to make. Bro couldn’t even answer the question about example of shilling so they had to pivot into the crime of taking money from a foundation to produce high quality educational content.

            How dare they?

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m trying to think of their ‘fossil fuel shilling’ video and only videos that come to mind are where they say we’re too entrenched in the fossil fuel industry to make a switch to renewable overnight. It’s just not realistic.

            And other than fuel, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of products made from petroleum. Approximately 85% of petroleum is made into fuel. Rest is used to make things like pharma products, paint, pesticides, polymers etc.

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              even people who needs to use petrolatum(aka protroleum) comes from it, for thier dry skin, plus it used in many topical medications. topical ointment medication is more potent than the cream forms.

          • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 hours ago

            $11 billion

            0.05%

            “A small loan of a million dollars.”

            Does any of that matter in this situation, anyway? Exaggerating their content in exchange for money already places question on their reliability as an educational content creator.

            • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t think you understood what they’re saying. Try reading it again.

              Hint: the investment of $11 billion refers to investment of Gates Foundation in fossil fuels.

              • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                Hint: the investment of $11 billion refers to investment of Gates Foundation in fossil fuels.

                Well, considering these exact words were used:

                That foundation owns over $11 billion in investments in the fossil fuel industry, including coal-burning utility companies.

                What can I say but duh. If I misunderstood anything, it was the comment I replied to, which was unclear about the “0.05% down from 6%” detail, and seemed to be associating that with the $11 billion figure by context.

                But hey, nice deflection, and super cool of you to be that rude about it, too.

    • AceBonobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      These things are to be expected when you get bought by private equity,

      Excuse me, what?

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        They are owned by private equity? It’s pretty common these days for the more popular YT channels. Veritasium, Astrum, Fireship, fern., and Hoog are some other examples. Basically, if it’s a popular YT channel, it’s either owned by PE, in negotiations to be acquired by PE, or pursued by a PE firm in the hopes that they can acquire it. Private equity is accelerating their acquisitions, actually, and they want to control everything that captures the attention of viewers.

        Here’s a video that talks about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJ-rRXWhElI

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No wonder veritasium has felt “off” for me for a good while as well. A few years ago I deliberately stopped watching that channel, seems there was a deeper reason behind my superficial reasons and gut feelings

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Do you have actual evidence for Kurzgesagt being among PE-owned channels, or are you just extrapolating? Because the video you linked doesn’t mention them, and a quick search didn’t turn up anything about that.

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          There’s an incredible amount of money in those offers. Years ago Linus Tech Tips got an offer of 100m, so I get why people take the money.

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I mean, I would probably sell the channel myself. That’s a lifechanging amount of money. I would buy some land deep in the backcountry, build a little walled village, and invite my family and friends to come live there. Grow our own food, set up some solar panels and wind turbines, buy up plenty of guns and ammo, and see if we couldn’t hunker down and live out the ever more likely downfall of the American economy in relative peace.

            • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              So basically you would turn yourself in a mini-me version of Zuckenberg, Musk and Bezos. Given this consideration I would reassess my life priorities if I were you

          • Rose@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Astrum makes space stuff videos? I dunno, been a while.

            Fireship makes videos about programming. Has series about “(Programming language/Framework) explained in 100 seconds”, for example. I think people are complaining that the channel is slipping into AI dudebroery.

            Hoog is a history/explainer type channel, I think.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yes, and also I was able to extrapolate that much, but I was looking for some idea of what kind of content they provided.

              That said, I can look them up; apologies for bothering you on the matter.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Anyone down voting this should be ashamed of themselves.

          Like deeply and personally ashamed.

          The type of shame that follows them for the rest their lives, because that’s how scummy you’d have to be in order downvote someone shining a light on how private equity is buying out major YouTube channels.

          Something that I was entirely unaware of, and appreciate your comment regarding.

          • hikaru755@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Bringing this general issue up in a thread about Kurzgesagt, without also providing evidence that Kurzgesagt specifically is actually part of that issue, is at best irrelevant and at worst misleading though

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I get it. They like the channel, and don’t want to think that a channel they love could do something they don’t love. Or maybe some of them don’t see it as a bad thing in the first place.

            Me, I’m the opposite. I want to know who owns the media I consume, because I want to know who might be influencing the things I see. It’s always better to have the whole truth, even if that truth hurts. It doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy the channel still, it just means you’re better prepared to understand the context of anything that that channel might say. Even cold hard facts with empirical evidence can be propaganda, depending on how it’s presented.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Have you ever watched the channel? They even made a video outlining their process which takes months of work.

      • kalkulat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Nope, and this one is NOT going to change that … can’t take all that cutesy animation and the fast-flowing babble for 2 minutes, let alone 12

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They have been doing this animation style since 2013.

      Why do you think they use AI?

      I think your AI senses are broken, you see AI everywhere where there is not. You’re like the extreme opposite of AI Tech Bro. Like you have paranoid AI-phobia or something.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      3 hours ago

      i mean thier animation is pretty much looks like AI, they cant even use real photos, videos, which is out there already.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And of course, the video was preempted by an AI slop ad of a talking monkey wearing a neck brace.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Use Firefox + uBlock Origin on desktop and on mobile. Only watch YouTube via Firefox. Never see these bullshit ads again.

      Currently adblocking is winning the war of the technical evolution of control vs. resistance.

        • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          And VacuumTube for an app like experience on HTPC’s, linux based set top boxes, as well as MacOS and windows or linux based tablets.

          Edit: added hyperlink to projects github page.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Sounds better than the fucking singing purple llama I get all the time ruining a song from Dirty Dancing by changing the ‘I’ to ‘AI’.

      ‘AI had the time of my life’ doesn’t even make sense!

      • biofaust@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It is literally AI taking time out of of your life, I don’t see how that doesn’t make sense to you.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Some of their videos are pretty good, but taking funding from billionaires is never a good look.

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It’s definitely not only that.
    I and, from what I’ve seen discussed here and elsewhere online, many other people have stopped watching the channel because of many valid reasons completely unrelated to AI. I haven’t watched a single one of their videos for years, something changed in their content and I just lost interest. Then there have been several controversial events throughout the years, both objective bad stuff and subjective things that made many loose interest and faith in their integrity. They definitely became one of the many channels that lost it’s way because of how big it got. The animations became too “perfect” in a weird way, they lost their personality and they also got scared of having real opinions so they started doing this “all sides” shit and that’s when I tapped out. I’ve tried to watch new videos from them about once every 6 months or so, but I can’t even make it past a minute without completely loosing interest.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In that it’s mostly a merch ad hidden behind a clickbait title.

        So I guess it’s a good test for that sort of “just read the headline” response.

        It’s been a rough few days and I think I may be coming around. What hope is there to parse AI misinformation if people can’t parse a Reddit-like link aggregator?

        I may be done with this place at this point. It’s just all bad. If not the whole Internet, certainly the whole of social media.

      • TheAsianDonKnots@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean, I didn’t watch this video because I lost interest when the channel started getting really dark around 2020. I just needed a laugh during the pandemic. I didn’t need 4 videos in a row about the end of the world, then a few about the end of the universe, followed by a future civil war. It was too much.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ironic coming from one of the preeminent traditional slop channels

          • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Propagating feel-goodism about climate change while taking money from the Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation and saying that eventually climate change will be solved by technology, whitewashing carbon capture technologies and overselling their potential, taking money from Templeton Foundation when making videos about consciousness, using the “Israel fighting Hamas” narrative in a 2025 video regarding wars…

  • Davy Jones@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    This whole video felt like an advertisement to me. I’d already seen it twice, was it necessary to crosspost it again? You could at least have waited a couple of weeks before reposting the same content.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Kurzgesagt became (non AI) slop itself so im not surprised. All the videos of them that i have watched in the past few years were disappointments.

  • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I mean, you’re petroleum industry apologists, so for a change I’m not that broken up.