cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/47935906
The son answered the door and, while he permitted the agents to search his home, claiming he had nothing to hide, he asked if they could wait first while he put the family dog, Chop, a Rottweiler, away in the bathroom before they walked in, as the dog could be aggressive…
According to the family, it is at this point that the son went to his pickup truck to retrieve his ID and a Border Patrol agent entered the home and, as a result, ended up shooting the dog.The family stressed that the agents knew-- the son had told them-- that Chop was put in the bathroom for their safety and that the agents opened the door, let Chop out and shot him.
Furthermore, the family said none of the Border Patrol agents helped the family, who desperately tried to render aid to the dog, which bled to death on the kitchen floor.
The family added that when they confronted agents, Border Patrol reportedly told them they were working from an anonymous tip tied to the previous owners of the home, who lived there two years ago.
DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, LET THESE THUGS INTO YOUR HOME WITHOUT A JUDICIAL WARRANT.
Administrative warrants should not be a thing.
The entire point of the 4th amendment was that the King would issue general warrants which gave the power to determine who to search or sieze to the agent instead of a judge. This power was massively abused and was one of the earliest issues where States acted to try to curtail the power of the crown in the colonies.
Giving that power to the agent’s organization results in exactly the same outcome. People are being searched and siezed without a judicial finding of probable cause. This should not be a thing. A person’s freedom and property should not be in danger of being seized based on the whims of law enforcement.
You can already see the abuses, ICE had an administrative warrant to go after some “”“”““TDA””“”“” gang members and they raided an entire apartment building full of people. This is exactly the kind of general search that lead to the 4th amendment.
Do they even need a warrant now?
Federal troops are being let into our cities, where they kill our family cats and dogs, believe it, remember when Trump pretended to care about this kinda thing?
remember when Trump pretended to care about this kinda thing?
Not really. He appointed a puppy-killer as the head of DHS and a brain-worm addled deer hunter as the head of the FDA. It’s been pretty clear that he supports armed thugs killing animals for leisure and gratification.
Now, unarmed immigrants not killing or eating pets, on the other hand…
DHS trying to repair their reputation with local police departments one dead dog at a time.
It’s a prerequisite.
So, when can we normalize taking these “agents” down to the river to talk about the rabbits?
I’ll tell you what, if one of them shows up and kills my dog, they’re gonna have to kill me too, because if they don’t, imma kill them. Either way, my life is over, but if I can take one of those fuckers with me, I’m gonna.
So it’s not just the ATF that will shoot your dog? /s
This is bullshit. Learn the laws and protect yourselves and your families! The 2A is there for just this reason!
