• SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Usually these systems rely on people getting on/off at different stops, rather than one stop seeing full volume. If it’s one stop, chances are it’ll look like a terminus station and you’ll need several platforms and possibly dual-side boarding to each train. It’ll be quite a bit wider than tracks with no station, or a minimalist station.

    This is pretty common at major sports arenas.

    The same of course applies to other transit options: high-capacity bus stops take up space, and motorway interchanges and especially carparks also take up a lot of space.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you want to account for boarding platforms in the metro example, you also have to account for the parking in the car example to make a reasonably fair comparison.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Usually these systems rely on people getting on/off at different stops, rather than one stop seeing full volume. If it’s one stop, chances are it’ll look like a terminus station and you’ll need several platforms and possibly dual-side boarding to each train. It’ll be quite a bit wider than tracks with no station, or a minimalist station.

      yeah, on the tram line i typically take, we have like 1 stop where lots of people get on/off, like 30 people per door, and it always takes 1-2 minutes to unload all the people/new people to enter. i think it’s just outright planned-into into the route’s timing plan.