Normally I would agree, but this administrations actions over the year entrenched police/military protections from citizens from the get-go and strategically targeted cities to incite retaliation. It is clear conflict with American citizens in some form is a desirable outcome.
Attacking SNAP was a calculated move, but outcome turned unfavorable so they are backtracking. Polish the turd with spin, and try something else.
Yes, but all the while they are facing more controlled resistance. The more resistance builds, the less they can try to pull off. Eventually there is a crack in either direction. They have a timeline they need to keep or they won’t enact their plan on time.
Normally I would agree, but this administrations actions over the year entrenched police/military protections from citizens from the get-go and strategically targeted cities to incite retaliation. It is clear conflict with American citizens in some form is a desirable outcome.
Attacking SNAP was a calculated move, but outcome turned unfavorable so they are backtracking. Polish the turd with spin, and try something else.
Yes, but all the while they are facing more controlled resistance. The more resistance builds, the less they can try to pull off. Eventually there is a crack in either direction. They have a timeline they need to keep or they won’t enact their plan on time.