• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I wish in cases like these, the jury could sanction the prosecution, like not guilty, and we revoke your right to practice law for 90 days for being such fucking idiots and harming the accused, and wasting our fucking time.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Also just further on this… think of how many frivilious law suits could be prevented with that. Don’t let the jury block them for a year, and maybe keep a harsher thing like 90 days for state/feds, but imagine if someone hires a lawyer to sue someone for something absolutely ridiculous, and they knew they would risk not being able to practice law for a week if they offend the jury for how stupid it was.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        For civil suits, some states have something called anti-SLAP (?) laws, which try to do something similar by allowing the defendant to sue the plaintiff.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I still think just giving the jury some of that power on the spot would be better, now you’re doing yet another lawsuit, and the lawyer isn’t at risk if it’s the defendent suing the plaintiff and you still gotta have the Jury rule on that when they could have just ruled on it on the spot the first time.

          It’s nice to know there is some recourse though.