In her new book, Kamala Harris insists she only lost the election because she didn’t have enough time. But she accidentally demonstrates the real reason: she’s a terrible politician.
No what you are describing isn’t even really a politician, but just a demagogue.
A demagogue makes promises to win an election, a politician work to deliver on the promises, and help make things better.
A politician is a person who participates in policy-making processes
Winning an election is only a means to become a politician, not the end.
Politicians make decisions, and influence the formulation of public policy.
Exactly the parts I described as determining whether a politician is good or bad.
A more formal definition:
Politician: 1: a person experienced in the art or science of government especially: one actively engaged in conducting the business of a government. 2a : a person engaged in party politics as a profession.[1]
So contrary to what you claim, not at all about campaigning or election by any definition, but the actual work that is done AFTER an election.
No what you are describing isn’t even really a politician, but just a demagogue.
A demagogue makes promises to win an election, a politician work to deliver on the promises, and help make things better.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician
Winning an election is only a means to become a politician, not the end.
Exactly the parts I described as determining whether a politician is good or bad.
A more formal definition:
So contrary to what you claim, not at all about campaigning or election by any definition, but the actual work that is done AFTER an election.