One federal employee said in a court filing that they ācannot in good conscience pretend to agree with President Trumpās policies.ā
Government employees asked a federal judge Wednesday to block the Trump administration from encouraging job applicants to demonstrate their loyalty to the presidentās agenda.
In aĀ lawsuitĀ filed earlier this month, a group of federal labor unions argues that the White Houseās āmerit hiring planā violates applicantsā First Amendment rights. The plan, put forth by the Office of Personnel Management, includes the following short essay question:
āHow would you help advance the Presidentās Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.ā
maybe they did not tell you that, but there is whole rest of the world behind us borders and not everything is āus basedā.
i am not us citizen on a website that is not hosted on us soil, doing something that is absolutely not illegal in my jurisdiction.
the only international cooperation you would get from justice system in my country would be showing you the middle finger, because āamerican snowflake did not like something they read on the internetā is not a crime here. go back to comics, or cry to mods, whichever you prefer.
Correctā¦
But youāre on a lemmy.world community right now. And itās US based, and hosted on US soil, even tho your local instance may not be. But this community is, and this is where your comments are going and where theyāre being posted.
Doesnāt matter if itās a crime there.
Or even if itās a crime in America.
Because a civili lawsuit isnāt criminalā¦
That link didnāt go into the difference of civil lawsuits and criminal prosecution in America, I could find one if youāre not able on your own tho
Iām happy to try and help you understand, if you donāt want help understanding, itās as easy as not replying again. Although Iām afraid continued incivil comments will likely keep resulting in your comments being deleted.
you know what? go ahead and sue me, that will show me how right you are š
What would that prove that the SC ruling from that article hasnāt already proven?
Iāve shown you proof that it can happen, along with a very detailed article going into the specifics of how it happens.
But youāve went off on a tangent, I started with:
And now youāre arguing I couldnāt win?
So you agree with me?
Admittedly itās hard to review the exchange after the majority of your comments have been removed.
it could help you understand that us supreme court doesnāt rule behind us borders. whether it actually would, i have no idea.
i understand you are trying unconventional attack vectors, but 2 out of 5 is not a majority, swetie. i see you are as good in math as you are in law. i am done with this discussion, bye.
Butā¦
Iāve linked you an article multiple times, even quoting the relevant sections on forum determinationā¦
It would all happen in the US courts, again, like the link I provided explained in depth. It doesnāt matter where you are, because your commenting on a community hosted in America.
Like youāre right that US SC doesnāt effect me suing you in your countryās legal system, but literally no one is saying that. And I could have sworn we already got on the same page that this would happen in US courts?
And thatās fine, all you have to do is stop replying.