Left-leaning challengers in the Rust belt are throwing chaos into a divided party struggling to rebuild after Trump’s win

From Detroit to Pennsylvania to Buffalo, New York, and here in Ohio, insurgent, progressive Democrats are defeating their long-established colleagues in dozens of school board, city council and mayoral races, throwing the already-divided national party into chaos, even as polls indicate it stands to potentially benefit at next year’s midterm elections due to the Trump administration’s divisive policies.

In Lancaster, Pennsylvania, one of seven swing states whose voters in recent years have decided the country’s presidential election, 37-year-old Jaime Arroyo was elected mayor on 4 November, becoming the first Latino mayor in the city’s 295-year history. In La Crosse, Wisconsin, another swing state, Shaundel Washington-Spivey, the city’s first Black and out gay mayor, beat a fellow Democratic party candidate with extensive local government experience last April.

Candidates such as Turner-Sloss, Arroyo and Washington-Spivey are campaigning on combating rising housing costs and providing better public transit infrastructure at a time when affordability issues and federal government policies are driving many working families into crisis.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think most democrats have been voting for democrats while wishing they were more left. Voting for democrats hasn’t been about liking the candidates. It’s been more about disliking the opposing candidates.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      This was indeed me for the last 20ish years. STAR voting or similar now, plz (and an end to gerrymandering)

    • SereneSadie@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      One side was hammering on about terrorising minorities for years.

      So yeah, if its a bad choice to avoid literal death threats from the government, a bad choice is better than death.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        if its a bad choice to avoid literal death threats from the government, a bad choice is better than death.

        What this sentiment always ignored, is there’s no reason it has to be a “bad choice” and shitty candidates aren’t good enough to consistently win.

        Fucking wild people are still saying that in 2025 though