• BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not so sure that’s true. There is a shit load of land used to grow corn to make ethanol that’s farmed by independent farmers. In the US most farmland is used for soy beans and corn for livestock feed or fuel. It wouldn’t be a simple or cheap undertaking, but that last could be utilized more efficiently to directly or indirectly fees people.

      I would also bet there are enough people that would love to be farmers that can’t because land isn’t available or cheap that would step up if large farm operations were broken up. That’s pure speculation, but even if one mega farm were split 4 ways, that would still be an improvement to the current situation.

      • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, then farming made up more than 15% of the work force, today that number is less than 2%. Because large production farms became common.

        • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          And we had none of the efficiency, gmo’s, and a fraction of the available laborers, and were using smaller amounts of land for farming.

          • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The efficiency comes at scale, not diffuse small farms.

            GMOs yes.

            Modern farming is less labor-intensive, not sure on your point there.

            Ag land use down 21.7% 1950-2002 Source. Downward trend continues through 2024 Source.