• balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wasn’t this the main selling point of the cybertruck, almost verbatim?

    • Killer57@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Which has been hilarious when put into practice, as seen pictured is a cybertruck leaving its rear axle behind after a collision.

      Edit: I posted this as a reply to the comment of driving over someone else.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, that shit was so disgusting. Your car will just drive over the other car in case of an apocalypse. In an accident, it will just be the other guys problem

      That’s why i don’t feel bad for the idiots who bought the Reichs mobile

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe. But in reality people in Cybertruck are more prone to die from the collision than anyone in a similar sized car.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Because…the exoskelton design does not disperse energy in a collision, so that energy is transfered to the Nazis in the cabin.

        While Musk sold the idea of bulletproof windows, those would be illegal because EMTs could not use then in an emergency. Side windows are supposed to break. His syncophants at Tesla were too scared to tell him his idea was stupid, so he threw a bearing through the window live.