• backgroundcow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      (Spoilers, obviously)

      Nothing confusing about TENET at all, huh? In the very first scenes a guy gets reverse shot by a bullet embedded in the side of the stairs of an opera, and the bullet is “sucked” into the muzzle of a gun, and the ugly hole in the stairs goes away.

      In our forward moving time: what is the origin of that hole? When did it appear? Has it been there since the opera was built? Did the people building these stairs do that with a big ugly hole in it, possibly with an embedded bullet? If not, where and when did it come from?

      The thing is, the whole premise of forward+backwards moving things sharing the same reality falls apart if you stop to think about it for a minute.

    • chris@l.roofo.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      I could follow just fine. I just found it a not very good movie. It was convoluted for the sake of being convoluted.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I said that after watching it.

          The sci-fi element really didn’t add anything to the story it could have just been a fun blockbuster action flick and it would have worked fine.

          • bless@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            But then it would be any other film, not a Christopher Nolan one ;)

            • chris@l.roofo.cc
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              The movie was Christopher Nolan saying “Look how hard I can Christopher Nolan this movie. No one has ever Christopher Nolaned so hard.” At least for me.

    • happyfullfridge@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      It wasn’t confusing but the logic of its mechanics weren’t consistent. I think some people thought there was logic to follow, hence the confusion.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Conceptually, sure. But the last big setpiece made no sense from a visual perspective. I feel like you would need to show an overhead view of the map simultaneously, to actually keep track of what was happening.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah that scene where he’s needlessly fighting himself made complete sense. If you see yourself coming up to you with an intent to fight a battle you’ve already fought, confront yourself nevertheless as it’s way easier than just showing your identity.

      BWAAAAHM

    • Thirsty Hyena@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have always found it weird whenever people say they don’t get TENET, Inception or Interstellar on their first watch. I thought the plot were simple enough to understand.

      • 2xar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Right? They were pretty easy to follow. So easy that I’ve noticed about a dozen plotholes in them. Maybe these plotholes were confusing people, because they thought there would be a good explanation to them, that they are not getting. Nope, there aren’t. They are just full of plotholes.