• [email protected]@feddit.itOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes, because you accept that roads are dangerous because of cars.

    But who is giving this warning? The same institution that allowed the roads to become unsafe in the first place, and should protect vulnerable users instead of blaming them. This makes it victim blaming.

    Road is public space and it doesn’t make sense that so much of it is unsafe for people not in a metal cage. Do you see which community we are in, by the way?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Man, two things can be true at once. Car culture is a toxic blight on humanity, and also we don’t want dead kids. You can navigate reality without “accepting” (meaning approving of) it.

      • [email protected]@feddit.itOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Ok, but the main point is in the second sentence. I mean: the advice to not run down the kerb is something I say to my daughter, and i think it’s fine. The problem is where this comes from, the government who is shaking off responsibility for road safety by blaming vulnerable victims instead of working on the cause of danger (spoiler: cars, speed, drivers)

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think the problem is that things like this are the only thing government typically does. Not that they do it at all.