A federal judge denied pre-trial release for the suspect who reportedly planned a terror attack in New Orleans targeting federal law enforcement.

Federal Magistrate Judge Carole Whitehurst in Louisiana’s Western District on Thursday ordered that New Iberia native Micah Legnon, 29, must stay jailed until trial. He is being held on a count of threats in interstate commerce

Federal agents say Legnon, who is a former U.S. Marine, reportedly joined at least one online chat group where threatening, anti-government posts were uncovered. Legnon is also accused of posting at least one message on social media criticizing federal law enforcement agents who are participating in immigration enforcement efforts in New Orleans and across Louisiana, according to court documents.

Court records state Legnon’s post caught the attention of federal agents who began surveilling him.

They later saw Legnon leaving his home in New Iberia armed with weapons and body, according to court documents. He was pulled over and arrested tied to the threatening posts, federal officials said.

While officials have yet to identify an official motive publicly, experts say there are many possibilities as to why Legnon, a former servicemember, would become radicalized to the point of participating in political violence.

“There are varying factors that can contribute to individuals who are open to radicalization to whatever ideology there is,” said Lara Burns, head of terrorism research at the George Washington University Program on Extremism.

Before joining the world of academia, Burns worked with the FBI to study and combat terrorism.

“We have seen it, you know whether it is an individual who had a healthy lifestyle and then underwent some sort of personal trauma and was looking for a solution or was having an emotional crisis and found the answer in ideologies,” added Burns. “And in other instances, individuals who just inherently want to commit acts of violence, and they’re seeking an excuse to legitimize their behavior. They want to hate, they want to commit violence, and they rely on these ideologies that justify that in their mind so that they are not seeing themselves as bad actors rather seeing themselves as heroes.”

According to court documents, the FBI said Legnon participated in these groups under aliases including “Kateri” and “Black Witch” while posting in the group

A potential affiliation between Legnon and the Turtle Island Liberation Front, of which multiple members were arrested after officials say they planned bombings in Los Angeles, was also being explored by the FBI.

Burns says groups that operate as an echo chamber could become a breeding ground for people looking for a like-minded community, but in the context of political violence, these groups can potentially escalate from conversation to violence.

“You’re being encouraged to feel the way that you feel and encouraged to act upon those feelings in ways that you know society would disagree with. In that echo chamber, those ideas are praised,” said Burns.

The FBI said it uncovered evidence that led agents to believe that Legnon was headed to New Orleans to commit the possible terror attack.

Court documents state FBI agents specifically spotted Legnon move an assault rifle and body armor out of his home in New Iberia and place them into his vehicle just after noon on Dec. 12. Violent posts were being shared from an account suspected of belonging to Legnon around the same time, according to court documents.

A search warrant executed at the home uncovered sniper training manuals, SWAT training manuals, assault rifles and multiple rounds of ammunition, according to court documents.

Federal law enforcement agents working in the city are suspected of being Legnon’s target based on the posts made in the group, according to federal court documents.

Burns says Legnon’s prior combat training as a U.S. Marine could make apprehending him more urgent but added any extremist trying to participate in political violence can be dangerous.

“In this day and age a vehicle can be a weapon. If you have an extremist that wants to commit an act of violence, they can get in their car and use the car as a weapon. But I think across the board when you have individuals who have consumed an extreme ideology and believe that violence is the answer there is a threat there,” she said.

Burns says there are some behaviors to keep an eye out for to help identify if someone has fallen victim to a dangerous ideology and is preparing to participate in political violence.

“I think that there are a number of signs that people should be paying attention to. One is the complete immersion in social media, especially if that is a change in pattern for an individual also. I encourage people, especially parents with younger children who are exposed to social media to pay attention to when an individual begins to expose hatred towards a specific individual or a group of individuals, what they look like, where they come from,” she said.

Burns added that it’s important to have a conversation after noticing the change in behavior

“We should stop and ask why are you feeling this way and determine what the root is. And perhaps with that dialogue then you can off-ramp individuals who are going down the wrong path and being fed ideologies by members of the social media groups,” she explained.

Among the slew of documents filed this week was a financial affidavit signed by Legnon. The affidavit was submitted to the court as part of a request for Legnon to be granted a federal public defender because he could not afford an attorney.

Court records show a judge granted that request. Efforts to reach his attorney were not successful.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They want to hate, they want to commit violence, and they rely on these ideologies that justify that in their mind so that they are not seeing themselves as bad actors rather seeing themselves as heroes.”

    You mean like repeatedly and intentionally putting large numbers of people in a dangerous situation so that you can swoop in and save the day? Like convincing people to commit a terrorist attack so you can prove your value by showing the country you stopped it?

    The Informants:The FBI has built a massive network of spies to prevent another domestic attack. But are they busting terrorist plots—or leading them?

    The FBI’s Double Agent: The Informant at the Heart of the Gretchen Whitmer Kidnapping Plot Was a Liability. So Federal Agents Shut Him Up.

    The secret files offer an extraordinary view inside a high-profile domestic terrorism investigation, revealing in stark relief how federal agents have turned the war on terror inward, using informant-led stings to chase after potential domestic extremists just as the bureau spent the previous two decades setting up entrapment stings that targeted Muslims in supposed Islamist extremist plots. The files also suggest that federal agents have become reckless, turning a blind eye to public safety risks that, if addressed, could disrupt the government’s cases.

    “A saying we have in my office is, ‘Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.’”

    “We’re speaking from a position of power. That’s why we’re here. We planned this out. We know we have power.”

    The reports and recordings reveal how the FBI has adapted abusive war-on-terror sting tactics to target perceived domestic extremists and raise questions about whether the FBI pursued a larger effort to encourage political violence ahead of the 2020 election.

    Federal agents running the Whitmer kidnapping investigation put the public in danger to avoid undermining their operation, the files show.

    Longtime Paid FBI Informant Was Instrumental in Terror Case Against “Turtle Island Liberation Front”

    An FBI investigation into an alleged terror plot in Southern California bears the familiar hallmarks of the bureau’s long-running use of informants and undercover agents to advance plots that might not otherwise have materialized, court documents show.

    Ken Klippenstein actually predicted NSPM-7 would be used to justify something like the Turtle Island sting back in October and tried to warn America.

    Trump’s NSPM-7 is a Threat to Every American

    It is no conspiracy or exaggeration to point out that the history of the FBI shows that in the ’60s and ’70s and after 9/11, there were active efforts not just to investigate but to plant moles in left-wing and activist organizations to try and foment discord or provoke people into committing something that could be a crime. One of the things that was so scandalous after 9/11 was the FBI finding hapless, mentally ill Muslim men and trying to convince them to plan a terror attack so they could show that they’d stop the potential terror attack. That’s happened. And if they take this directive seriously, it directs them to do more of this. As you say, the list here is really remarkable.

    Yes, counterterrorism is a very ugly business. Again, when you are trying to preempt a crime before it has happened, how do you find out about it? You definitionally have to look at speech, because that’s the only way that you can get some indication of what’s going on. How do you monitor speech? That could be social media monitoring, or that could be a whole army of informants, which the FBI already has. You can read about them in the inspector general reports that the Justice Department puts out on the FBI. It goes right back to when you were mentioning COINTELPRO earlier. Well, that’s how you find out about things before they’ve happened. You have what are called “trip wire individuals” in different organizations or offices, people that can flag something for you that’s of interest. And what I want to stress most of all is just because you don’t engage in violence doesn’t mean that you don’t meet any of those other indicators. Then at that point they can open up an investigation, and they’re looking at your taxes. Did you file your taxes correctly?

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you’re at war, then State agents are legitimate targets. Killing the enemy is fair play.

    I’m not saying this is justified, just that it’s not terrorism to blow up pigs and army guys.

    • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you typing that from a state fusion center right now? Because you have to tell me if you are. Lol j/k you’re legally allowed to entrap me/get me to incriminate myself.

      In all seriousness, violence is bad. M’kay

      Don’t stoop to the level of the terrorists who hate free speech and the constitution.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Seems like not a lot of evidence. I figure a good part of Lemmy can’t leave their house with guns if this is all it takes.