As bad as any other but more easily fell to non sense, as the basic argument stemmed from the notion of everything being pre determined and using the notion of nothing can be said without pre suposing and accepting an all powerful creating deity, which led to circular reasoning and callous indiference towards even the most basic of argument.
In what way were they the worst? Were their arguments exceptionally bad?
As bad as any other but more easily fell to non sense, as the basic argument stemmed from the notion of everything being pre determined and using the notion of nothing can be said without pre suposing and accepting an all powerful creating deity, which led to circular reasoning and callous indiference towards even the most basic of argument.