• early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    We really need to make people more aware of how their data gets from A to B. I think most people think you need internet access for anything connected to a network to communicate. If more people realized that if device A is on your LAN and device B is on your LAN, there’s no reason traffic from A to B has to traverse the internet, they wouldn’t fall for stuff like this.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      Bah, there’s a LOT of devices that could talk to my father’s phone over the LAN if they were programmed that way. But, they aren’t. They report to a wall-known “cloud” server, and the app on his phone checks that same server for the latest status or to relay command/control.

      Nice advantage: can get status / send commands even when he is not on the LAN. Bad disadvantage: when the rural Internet blinks out (like every time it rains) he can’t tell the robo-vac which rooms to start cleaning.

    • bcgm3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What’s more, if the device in question is some simple thing like a thermometer, then there’s no reason for it to be networked at all. Just take the temperature and get on with your life!

      • early_riser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Indeed, a lot of people think it’s an active satellite connection when all it is is a receiver picking up a really accurate time signal.