Chief Justice John Roberts touted the independence of the federal judiciary as a “counter-majoritarian check” and urged Americans rattled by partisan politics to keep faith with the Constitution in an annual report Wednesday that steered clear of direct discussion of modern controversies.

Roberts’ history-heavy statement made no mention of Donald Trump, nor the intense conflict that has cropped up between federal courts and the White House since his second inauguration nearly a year ago.

Trump has questioned the legitimacy of courts that paused his policies and called for the impeachment of judges who ruled against him.

  • Seaguy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is just a prep for when the GOP loses significantly in the mid terms and the pendulum swings back against them. There is no intent to not be in lock step with project 2025, it is just a coincidence. I hope there’s significant restructure of the supreme court soon as more than half of them are bought and paid for.

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    This dude will go down in history as the man who put the final nail in the coffin of the “republic” all representation of the people died with citizens united. Our government is now literally occupied by Israel and oligarchs a lot of whom are immigrants from South Africa

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sorry bud, an indepdent judicary ship sailed a long time ago. As soon as people started labeling judges as liberal or conversative, Democractic or Republican appointed, etc.

    This kind of wording confirms that judges are just part of the political process.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 hours ago

    A report full of right-wing lies. Might be worth mentioning that point.

    What Roberts really doesn’t want is for Congress to exercise its constitutional power to regulate the workings of the Supreme Court and to establish ethical standards backed by law.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    He’s mad that the lower courts aren’t completely corrupt and the poors aren’t worshipping his decisions.

  • Gates9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m sympathetic to the idea that we don’t need a “Supreme Court”. We have a representative legislature. They don’t even follow the constitution or precedents. Frankly the institution is illegitimate.