• Rhoeri@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      198
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s an open act of war. But at least no one is talking about how he fucked kids.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s definitely still be posted as a respond from the left.

        The right is showing they don’t care about kids getting diddle just like back in the day. Maga after all means back to a time when it’s the victims fault.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      If a country bombed Argentina and kidnapped Milei the US would retaliate immediately. But when the US pull this heinous shit it’s fine. Always has been.

      • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        When you have the US military on your side, you can do anything you want.

        Why so many people are missing this obvious threat is beyond me. All nations should be shoring up their military defense, and fast.

        Maduro is not a good person. But that’s not what matters here. Plenty of countries have evil people at the helm.

        What matters here is MAGA, with by far the world’s most powerful military, is imposing its will on the United States and the world. If you think this kind of successful operation is ever followed up by “ok guys we got everything we wanted, let’s stop now”, give your head a shake.

        We will know Russia traded Venezuela for Ukraine in the next few days. I bet the EU is in pure panic mode now. Would not surprise me to see a move on Taiwan too.

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          When you entertain the notion that the religious nutjobs who whisper to Trump’s ear actually wants Earth to become a nuclear wasteland your disposition is bound not to be sunny anymore

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And many world leaders will defend it because they know US bastards could do the same to them.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        An old man with everything to lose if he ever steps down from power, the political and diplomatic literacy of a temper-throwing child with the nuclear launch codes.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          I like how you mentioned nuclear launch codes.

          Any nation without nuclear capabilities should see this as a sign to develop them ASAP.

          I don’t want more nukes in the world, but the US doesn’t pull this shit on nuke capable nations

      • gnutrino@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Never mind Zelensky, if I were Taiwan’s president I’d be looking at the US creating a big naval distraction for itself at the same time as affirming that heads of state are fair game with more than a little trepidation…

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Imperialism and general fuckery, no…but to my knowledge this is the first time the US has opened a conflict by just straight up taking the head of the foreign government.

        Unless, of course, you’ve got something that says different.

          • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Noriega didn’t surrender until 2 weeks of conflict had passed.

            Again, has the US ever opened a conflict by kidnapping a head of state?

            • setsubyou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              ·
              4 days ago

              There’s also the US-backed coup in Hawaii where they put the queen under house arrest first thing.

                • baines@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  the only technicality was it wasn’t the ‘US government’ doing this, they just okayed it after

                  completely unrelated rogue gunboat guys, we promise

                • flandish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  i am. it’s manufactured consent at the minimum and a fucking act of war at the maximum. see what the us did in the gulf of tonkin for instance. the us does not care as it is a terrorist state.

                  i bet the new guy is … oddly friendly with oil corporations

                  • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    You’re conflating guilt or culpability with level of military involvement.

                    Did they result in equivalent loss of life? Damage to property? Commitment of forces on both sides?

                    One is a literal invasion. The other is missiles hitting fishing boats. Both are disgusting. Both are wrong.

                    But you cannot say that they are an equivalent level of military involvement.

                  • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    How?

                    One is strike operations on individual vessels operating in international waters and, while illegal and reprehensible, doesn’t even come close to being equivalent to an amphibious landing invasion of a nation utilizing all branches of the US military.

                    Are you even remotely serious?

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I suppose that depends on whether or not you consider the wars against the indigenous people here in North America actual wars.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Maduro took a deal, this wasn’t a kidnapping.

      The clue is Trump says he was captured, and he always lies.

      Edit. Someone got a deal lol

      • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        4 days ago

        …okay.

        How about, instead of presupposing what he’s lying about and why, we try and actually find out the truth? Reality still does matter, y’know.

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It’s all over the news, this was an agreed deal.

          Edit lol. Deal done.

              • awaysaway@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                i’m surprised to see yall so convinced of the opposite but i understand if you just not wanting to sensationalise without data. is the US military really so infinitely far ahead that snatching a head of state is a guaranteed operation?

                i suppose i haven’t see any independent verification that they have maduro at all so could be a bluff

                • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  For me personally, it’s the statement of fact without sources. This is the era of AI and social disinformation. “Trust me, bro!” carries even less weight now than ever.

                  Don’t get me wrong, even though Venezuela doesn’t deserve US aggression, Maduro is still a shady conman and I wouldn’t put it past him to sell out his country.

                  But I won’t believe it just because someone said it was true.

                  • awaysaway@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 days ago

                    yeah agreed across the board there.

                    fwiw new information here re: vice president demanding proof of life

                    Interesting to see Spain’s response which acknowledges their position against Maduro whilst condemning the attack