The first section is failing to understand the scenario. The user would ask a question and the llm would respond. The user would challenge that response. That doesn’t include some burden-of-proof. The user isn’t making a claim. The user asks about the claims provided by the llm. So that is a wonderful example of bad reasoning.
The 2nd section is not disagreeing but answering the prompt. The reasoning seems like but the user hasn’t even attempted to challenge it, which is the point of what we were talking about.
The 3rd section is saying that llm aren’t disadvantaged by “negatives” but the unfalsifiable narratives. Which is funny because that was never claimed. The negative is a unfalsifiable narrative. The lack of evidence can’t PROVE that it didn’t happen. It makes it very unlikely but that is why I say prove. So llm misunderstands and consequently fails at reasoning.
I love it.
The first section is failing to understand the scenario. The user would ask a question and the llm would respond. The user would challenge that response. That doesn’t include some burden-of-proof. The user isn’t making a claim. The user asks about the claims provided by the llm. So that is a wonderful example of bad reasoning.
The 2nd section is not disagreeing but answering the prompt. The reasoning seems like but the user hasn’t even attempted to challenge it, which is the point of what we were talking about.
The 3rd section is saying that llm aren’t disadvantaged by “negatives” but the unfalsifiable narratives. Which is funny because that was never claimed. The negative is a unfalsifiable narrative. The lack of evidence can’t PROVE that it didn’t happen. It makes it very unlikely but that is why I say prove. So llm misunderstands and consequently fails at reasoning.
What the fuck is this word salad you’re regurgitating.
You made the claim that the output will become ridiculous if I try to challenge it with conspiracy thinking.
You’re the one who needs to demonstrate it.
Not a word salad. Your response proves my point.
What’s your point?