In relation to this, thinking about a new community for Political Activism. Calls to action, that kind of thing.

The rules would be super simple:

  1. Purpose is for protest organizing. [Country, City, State]

  2. Absolutely no calls for violent action.

  3. No links to fundraisers. Too rife for fraud and abuse. Stories about fundraisers would be fine, but no GoFundMes, etc.

Think there’s room for PolticalActivism?

  • libertyforever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Calling people liars or fascists doesn’t change the actual evidence. The legal focus remains on whether the officer reasonably perceived an imminent threat in that split second, not on social media narratives or insults.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You disregarding the evidence and lying to protect your murderer, doesn’t change the evidence. Also, when someone pops off and does attack you in real life for your shitty lies, it will be self defence. You have no defense.

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Name-calling and threats don’t turn disagreement into ‘lying.’ And implying real-world violence over an argument just proves you’ve abandoned evidence and law entirely.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          They abandoned law and order when they shot an innocent woman in the face. You have as well. You’re an accomplice. You’ll say the wrong shit at the wrong time and get a bullet for your trouble from the very fascists you are simping for.

          Keep replying, not like we don’t already have your IP

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            That’s an explicit threat and doxxing intimidation, not an argument. Disagreeing about evidence or law does not make someone an ‘accomplice.’

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 minutes ago

              Boo-hoo. The fascist, who is an explicit threat by existing, doesn’t like it when other people apply their own logic against them. You are an accomplice according to the law that you refuse to follow. You are a terrorist and an accomplice according to the rule of law.

              Fuck off. This will never be a Nazi bar. If you don’t, we will make you.

              We now have your address.

              I thought you don’t engage with people that are telling you to fuck off? I guess I was right. You have no thinking skills, and you fascist can’t help engaging with normal people that resist your lies. Fucking weirdo.